Tags
America 911, anti-Semitism, BBC, Christianity and Islam, Civilisation, Counter-Jihad, Cultural Marxism, Defend the modern world, Demographics of Europe, English Defence League, Eurabia, Islam and the West, Islamisation of Europe, Islamisation of London, Multiculturalism, Muslim demographics, Muslims in Europe, No to Turkey in the EU, politics, Race and ethnicity in the United States Census, Tommy Robinson
Although I write in favour of European self-rescue, it should be clarified that I am under no illusions as to the likelihood of the measures required being adopted, now or in the future.
The chances, to put the matter frankly, of persuading an indoctrinated population to do something they have been conditioned – often since childhood – to regard as sinful, are zero.
Europe’s rescue from Islamisation requires discrimination, on both national and local stages. At the national level, every government must realise that the needs of its historic majority are more its rightful business than the ‘rights’ of a swelling and hostile minority. At the local level meanwhile, people must learn to recognise human difference as something vital to their personal security.
Discrimination however, is – perhaps more than anything else – anathema to the liberal mind. Consequently, even if the thought of European Muslims being sent their deportation papers may thrill the imagination, that is almost certainly where it will remain.
Muslim immigration will probably be halted the first day after the collapse of the European Union, but that will only deal with a hypothetical inflow and will solve nothing as to those already settled. On this point, the most likely scenario is that those Muslims who already live here (and their posterity) will be part of Europe forever.
Sure, the natives will thrash and moan a bit as each demographic milestone is met with grim punctuality; 15%… 20%… 25% etc… But these will be mere imitations of self-confidence, and of those historic conditions that once permitted self-confidence. Much like the re-enactments of medieval battles on a wet Tuesday in Bosworth, these will be resistance-themed carnivals, hemmed in by police and finally dispersed by reality.
True, it is unlikely that Muslims will capture all of Europe, but it is now almost certain that they will conquer its capitals and other large cities. The demographic material is already in place for the Islamisation of London, Brussels, Stockholm, Oslo, Paris, Berlin, Duisburg, Leicester, Malmo, Marseilles, Luton, Strasbourg, Copenhagen, Amsterdam, Rotterdam, the Hague and the urban parts of Switzerland.
These are all famous and historic places, decorated with treasures invaluable to world-history. What will happen to them when they are populated almost exclusively by Muslims?
Students of Asia’s modern history will be familiar with the fate of the Buddhas of Bamiyan; an ancient relic of pre-Islamic culture in Central Afghanistan. As is now notorious, the structure was exploded and the relics entirely destroyed by Taliban militants in 2001.
Just imagine that – the scene and all its details – for a moment. Picture it in your mind. Now – if you can – try to impose that image onto Rome, London, Paris or Berlin.
Instead of the Buddhas being demolished, imagine the Roman Colosseum, Buckingham Palace, Westminster Abbey, or the Eiffel Tower subjected to the same misfortune.
I can assure you these are not outlandish thoughts. Despite popular misunderstanding of the matter, the 9/11 hijackers did not target the Twin Towers out of hatred of American ‘economic power’. They were rather acting in line with the Qutbist condemnation of idolatry. In Wahhabi Islamism, any great man-made structure that attracts wonder or praise, and that is not built expressly for Islamic worship, is an idol. This is why the Twin Towers were brought low. This is also why the Saudi government – with the consent of the Wahhabist religious establishment – has demolished many ancient buildings connected with the life of Mohammad in Mecca and Medina. Mohammad, you see, is not regarded by Muslims as divine, and therefore any pilgrimage to, or veneration of artifacts associated with him is also considered idolatrous.
The Pentagon too, is an idol. It was built to symbolize the power of the American military – the power therefore of ‘men’, and was attacked for these reasons.
One cannot exactly estimate how many of the cultural treasures of Europe would also be considered idolatrous according to this same measure, but surely if the artifacts of Mohammad himself are not considered sacred, then why would the Brandenburg Gate be afforded any mercy?
A successful Muslim conquest of Europe will reset European history at year zero. History shall not be so much as changed, as removed entirely. Europe will be forced to forget itself; that it ever had a history to begin with; just as the Egyptians were made to forget their past, as were the Persians, the Phoenicians, the Babylonians and the Berbers, after they too fell to armies of Muslim conversion.
Away from cultural symbols, the mechanics of society will be greatly affected. Sharia courts will proliferate across Europe (whether governments allow them or not). Genital mutilation will continue in private. In the open, women will be assaulted on an increasing scale. Rape rates will skyrocket. Whatever pretentions a rational feminism ever had will be driven to extremism or else submission. Harassment will forbid native European women from urban centres and thus from commercial employment.
Elsewhere, shops selling alcohol will be vulnerable to attack and boycott. Terror-threats will paralyze subways. Every time Israel defends itself in the Middle East, anti-Semitism will become a violent reality.
There are potential military consequences too. The influential blogger Fjordman has commented on the dire possibility of French nuclear weapons falling into Muslim hands. I’m afraid it isn’t a fanciful idea. All it would take is one rogue Franco-Algerian general and Europe would be under a shadow of destruction.
All that for the false virtue of blind tolerance…
Pessimism like this is not an admirable trait, I know, but it is nevertheless appropriate to the situation Europe finds itself in. I see no sign of a popular movement able to achieve anything of substance on this issue. The EDL is all but finished. UKIP, the party in which so many good people invest their hopes, is practically neutral on the culture clash, preferring to badmouth Poles and Romanians than Pakistanis. In the Netherlands, Geert Wilders was trounced in the national elections. Where now?
As I say, this is a depressing post, but I do believe it pays to periodically remind oneself of the stakes of doing nothing.
D, LDN.
Excellent article! How do I share it on Facebook?
LikeLike
Thanks. You can post the url on facebook I think.
https://defendthemodernworld.wordpress.com/2014/03/04/if-we-do-nothing/
LikeLike
For the time being I think the threat seems not to be so overwhelming as you put it. On the other hand the real problem is not restricted to emigration. As you know we have lots of European born nationals joining Islam. What I think is really important is to reposition Islam on History abandoning the “old” and romantic ideas of the Islamic civilization, golden age, etc. etc. and exposing Islam as what it really is, means and represents at the present and in the past.
For instance Islam has been one of the main causes of the dark ages, and the subsequent civilization gap with the classic world. So the “war” against Islam must be won first of all on the mind of people, on the way Europeans see the reality. And as we all know the political correctness of the XX century as been terrible in changing the idea people has about the “invaders”.
I can talk with a good degree of property about this phenomena cause I’m from Portugal, a country that as been partially invaded by Muslims during 300 years, and where the “official” true is that we have received part of the golden age legacy, while nobody refers that the moors when invading our land destroyed the remains of the roman civilization…
I suppose you already know this video, nevertheless I think it is illustrative of an “alternative” History nobody is (yet) accepting…
LikeLike
I should clarifiy that many of the dystopian ideas in this article I don’t believe are going to happen in the next few years. In 2050, there will be a Muslim majority in all the cities I listed. I do believe my projections as to the effects of this process are accurate.
I agree with the rest of what you say, and I find that link very valuable.
LikeLike
Keep speaking on this topic. To say and do nothing is to enable our demise and enter into oblivion. Islam has a plan… Islam IS a plan. And if we willingly ignore these implications, then there will be no future for Western Civilisation. You’ve made it very clear in an honest and very erudite way. Some people are listening. More will soon. Thank you.
LikeLike
Thanks. I was pretty unsure about posting this article as I find defeatism is usually unhelpful. Nevertheless, the more people think about the dystopian future of Europe, the better.
LikeLike
I also think it’s good to educate people about why the Twin Towers were attacked in line with religious rather than political ideology.
LikeLike
Good entertaining video, thanks for the link.
LikeLike
Hеy therе! I сould have sworn I’ve been to this blog
before but after checking through some of the post I realized it’ѕ new to me.
Anyhoѡ, I’m definitely glad I found it and I’ll ƅe book-marking
and checking baϲk often!
LikeLike
Good article. Maybe discrimination is ideally anathema to the liberal mind. But they hypocritically practice it politically and culturally — prevalent in the US. Unfortunately, they won’t admit it is necessary.
LikeLike
Indeed. There are no more intolerant people than Leftists.
LikeLike
It’s amazing how they package and sell that message and people buy it. Like the p/c nonsense about Muslims/Islamists.The only ones less tolerant than the left are the Islamists.
LikeLike
Muslim populations in most European countries are extremely low. Even in the UK, Muslims make up approximately 4% of the total population (admittedly this is higher in cities like Birmingham). Your average Muslim immigrates to Europe for the opportunity of a richer life. There is no grand conspiracy amongst the 1.5 billion Muslims of the world to knock down the Eiffel tower. Obviously there are a group of terrorists who have launched jihad against Western civilization. But these people ALREADY exist as a threat as an external threat to the West. Even if Europe’s Muslim population were 0, the external threat of Al-Qaida and the Taliban would exist. It is those people we need to fear, not the ordinary Muslims going about their day. Most Muslims immigrated to Europe to get AWAY from the 24/7 violence in their own countries, not to promote it.
Also – Muslims have much higher birthrates than native Europeans. I don’t feel sorry for Europeans as you lot are CHOOSING not to have children (less than 2 on average which is below replacement levels). Meanwhile Muslims are easily out breeding you.
LikeLike
Pingback: ZION'S TRUMPET » The Answer to islamic Domination is Discrimination. Doing Nothing has a Very High Price.