Will There Ever be a Black President?

Tags

African American, Anglo-Saxon, anti-Semitism, Barack Hussein Obama, Barack Obama, Black, Black people, BNP, Civilisation, Coffee, Cultural Marxism, Defend the modern world, History, Multiculturalism, President, Race and ethnicity in the United States Census, Syria, United States

Racial classification in America has long been envied for its complication and absurdity. With roots in slavery and the fierce self-love of Anglo-Saxon agrarians, the American meaning of ‘White’ quickly evolved into something very different from its European sense. Commonly-speaking, one is only ‘White’ in America if one is of 100% pure (non-Spanish speaking) European heritage.

For example, if an American is 9/10ths White and the remainder is Black, the 1/10th Black heritage metaphysically dissolves all other ancestry to produce simply an ‘African-American’. If one is a blue-eyed, blonde-haired Spaniard with roots in Spain’s new world colonies, one is not European any more but ‘Latin’. Meanwhile, an Indian-American from South-West Asia is an ‘Asian-American’ but Arabs from South-West Asia are White-Americans. Follow?

The reason I raise this is because of a complaint I (and most reasonable people) have with the description of Barack Obama as ‘the First Black President’. He isn’t, and the claim that he is offers a false conclusion to a very significant trend of US social development.

Barack Hussein Obama was born to a White mother. In the absence of his father, the half-White Obama was raised by the said White mother. He later attended a multiracial school to which Black people contributed the tiniest demographic, and went on to a prestigious University whose intake was mostly White. He then resurfaced out the other end as a Black man. How does this happen?

Why, given the time and effort his mother (and only his mother) invested in the upbringing of this man, is he identified entirely with the attributes of his absentee father? He’s not even ‘biracial’ in popular tradition, but simply and starkly ‘Black’. His mother, his childhood and hundreds of his ancestors are airbrushed completely from his typology.

Surely a more sensible definition of Obama’s ethnicity would have him not as a Black man with some White heritage, but the reverse. Obama is a White man with some Black heritage.

Obama has little to nothing in common with his sub-Saharan paternal line. Their superstition and poverty couldn’t be more at-odds with the President’s atheistic intelligence, good humour, linguistic skill and (occasional) diplomatic grace. On the other hand, Obama would be readily suited to his maternal ancestors. Should they manage to get over the unseasoned bigotries of appearance, Obama would find along his Irish line, many people similar in character to himself, stretching back many centuries.

The question of whether America is ready for a Black President is thus still an open question. My guess would be no. One can hardly recall the candidacy of Herman Cain for the Republican nominee without smiling, and there seems to be no other examples forthcoming.

There is nevertheless a very bright hope for a second non-White President, and that is the brilliant Dr. Condoleezza Rice. The former Secretary of State is a woman of great qualification and  – should she contest and win an election – would likely provide a far superior regime to that presently enthroned.

D, LDN.

Advertisement

Miley Cyrus and White Cultural Decline.

Tags

American Liberty, Black, Cultural Marxism, Defend the modern world, Hannah Montana, Jonas Brothers, miley cyrus, Miley gone black, Multiculturalism, Robin Thicke, Taylor Swift, White nationalism

So little Hannah Montana has finally grown up. Well, that’s one way of putting it. She’s certainly changed.

In a video released this past Thursday, the former Country bumkin was almost unrecognizable. Gone is all that fresh-faced innocence and Republican-friendly charm. By way of their replacement (if not their repudiation) we were presented with a wild, twerking hedonist, as opposite to Hannah Montana as it’s possible to get.

If you look at the ‘likes’ bar accompanying this video on YouTube, you will see that the new Miley has divided people almost exactly in half. Reflecting this, the comments are almost all dedicated to argument rather than the usual adoring consensus. One half, dominated by American Caucasians (male and female) is outraged and disappointed. The other half, dominated by Blacks, Hispanics and Asians, appears delighted, triumphant even.

Why? Because Miley Cyrus (along with Taylor Swift) was once a poster-girl for mildly racist American conservatives. She was the archetypal good Southern girl, the daughter of a country music sensation, and her career was defined by conformity, chastity and a fidelity to family-friendly entertainment.

And now look.

The non-White sections of America might justly view Cyrus’s rebellion against White society as a huge scalp. The only greater prize would be Taylor Swift herself, and believe me there will now be rap artists compelled to seek her around the clock too.

Miley Cyrus has not become ‘Black’ as some commentators ludicrously suggest. She has however become another symptom of an ongoing racial crisis; namely the aging of White society, and the resultant hemorrhaging of cultural ground to younger ethnic groups.

The centre of White gravity is now conspicuously old in America, and getting older. By this same trend, White culture has become ever more morally stiff and disconnected from younger generations. If you are young and White in America, you are, whilst not yet in an ethnic minority, most certainly in a cultural one.

If that doesn’t matter to you and you just want to get a good job and have a family, then this isn’t a problem. But if you’re like the majority of young people in this digital age, and so not inclined to seek the same destiny as your parents, you must hop aboard a different ethnic train to escape it. 

There is also the issue of the decline of White masculinity. In an age of uber-confident Black millionaires (and a Black president), as well as dashing Latinos whose number never stops increasing, the White community throws up archetypes like the Jonas Brothers – castrated ladyboys with fop hairdos and chastity rings. Needless to say, this doesn’t really help either.

Miley Cyrus has gravitated to where there are real men and exciting aspirations. Minorities now have the youth, the masculinity, the music, the employment, and – most crucially – the future on their side.

Still, there are a few exceptions to the trend described. The current Billboard Number One single is a song called ‘Blurred Lines’ by White soul singer Robin Thicke. Mr Thicke, 36, displays an impressive compromise between White identity and the demands of contemporary culture. In the video to this song, Mr Thicke shares the stage with rapper TI and Black singer Pharrell, and yet upstages both gentlemen with a sophisticated, identifiably White demeanor.

Predictably, the destroyers of White society (Cultural Marxists) have already attacked Mr Thicke for this daring snatch-back of Masculine ground. White Feminists accuse him of ‘subtle allusions to rape’ and a more general ‘misogyny’ about his artistry. Such nonsense is best understood as Cultural Marxism when one compares it to the deafening silence from the same sources vis-à-vis African-American music.

Underlying White aging (and the decline of White society) is the sure and steady force of demographics. Nothing can be done now to reverse the extinction of White culture in America. Even republicans now acknowledge this and go in pursuit of Hispanic votes by endorsing ‘amnesty’. All that can be done by Whites is to try to slow this extinction by encouraging minority groups to swallow the same demographic suicide pills (feminism, over-civilization, fear of sex), as they have done and hope for fast-bearing fruit.   

D, LDN

On the Racism of Islamic Peoples.

Tags

Arab racism, Aryan, Black, Counter-Jihad, Cultural Marxism, Defend the modern world, Islamisation of London, Multiculturalism, No to Turkey in the EU, Pakistani, Race and ethnicity in the United States Census, Scotsman, South Kensington

Is it racist to say that some minority races are more racist than others? (try repeating that when you’re drunk). I would say that it wasn’t, but the official arbiters of what constitutes ‘racism’ would likely disagree.

According to the physics of the liberal universe, only White Northern Europeans can be actively racist. Behaviour which seems like ‘racism’ from other groups is either hallucinated or inapplicable.

We all know this conventional thinking to be absurd. We might not be open about it, but we all know it nonetheless. White Northern Europeans are plainly not the most racist ethnic group present in Britain today. They may be the majority, but that is something quite different and not a crime in itself.

So who (which ethnic group) takes the biscuit so to speak? I’ve narrowed it down to three non-White sections of society: Iranians, Arabs, and Pakistanis.

The first group to be discussed here, known variously as Iranians and/or Persians, require little introduction in a racism contest. Even within (and by the standards of) the Islamic world, Iranians are considered especially bigoted, and this includes against closely-related ethnic groups like Afghans and Pakistanis.

In Iran itself (a very divided ethnic state), the politics of racial appearance matter immensely. Nowhere has so much Europeanizing plastic surgery been expended on a population than in the Islamic Republic. Here, 40% of women under 40 have had some kind of surgery on their faces. Commonly, these procedures involve ‘de-Indianising’ native Iranian features by techniques like ‘nose sharpening’, hair-bleaching, and ‘lip streamlining’. And this isn’t just true in the motherland, but the diaspora too. It’s said (jokingly, I think) that if you light a match in the Persian area of South Kensington, you risk creating a fireball from the airborne residue of skin-lightening cream.

I remember once over-hearing a group of Iranians talking about President Obama in an SK coffee shop after his first election to office. They were excitedly inferring that the American IQ was being steadily reduced by interbreeding with ‘Niggers’ (who, incidentally, had made a pact with ‘Zionists’ to promote their assimilation). In Iran, they boasted, such people would never even be allowed to settle.

Iranian racism may derive from a long-held misunderstanding of the linguistic term ‘Aryan’, as in the term ‘Indo-Aryan languages’. The name Iran itself means ‘Land of the Aryans’ and was chosen to display sympathy with the regime of Adolf Hitler. Iranians, Afghans, Western-Indians and Pakistanis are members of an extended ethno-linguistic family with historic links to the development of European languages. If one really (and I mean really) stretches this, one can make Iranians, Indians, Pakistanis and Afghans part of the European definition. As a result, there is a notable movement among the Iranian diaspora seeking to align Iran with the extreme-right, and specifically those groups self-identified as Neo-Nazi.

Secondly, let us consider the Persians’ traditional ethnic rival, the Arabians. Some Arabs (although less racist on the whole than Iranians) are guilty specifically of anti-Black racism. In Syria and Lebanon, this chauvinism is deeply entrenched and rarely condemned. Black people in the Levant (almost always immigrant workers from East Africa) are frequently subject to verbal and physical abuse by employers and provided with lesser human rights than the majority. Even in Africa itself, such behaviour is commonplace. The genocide in Darfur, although not featuring a racial divide, was carried out by Arabic speaking Blacks against those who spoke native dialects, and was often framed in explicitly racist terms.

A more famous and less ambivalent case of race-hatred in the Arab world concerns the Jews. Long before the re-establishment of Israel, Jews were treated with suspicion by Arab populations, and many Arab leaders established favorable relations with Nazi Germany. Books like ‘Mein Kampf” and ‘The Protocols of the Elders of Zion’ became bestselling volumes shortly after their translations into Arabic. Both continue to do well to this day.

Finally, Pakistanis, being the most disliked group in modern English society, have also been known to seek comfort in racism. In their case, the targeting of the White majority.

On the 15th March 2004, Scottish teenager Kriss Donald was set upon on in Glasgow (for no other reason than his ethnicity) by a group of Pakistani Muslim men. After abducting him and driving him to a secluded location, they proceeded to torture him, repeatedly stabbing and slashing him with a kitchen knife and then finally setting his body on fire. According to The Scotsman newspaper, he died after having been set alight.

There have been many other cases of Pakistani-on-White murders, as well as innumerable cases of intimidation and harassment. All this is before we include the only recently revealed ‘grooming scandal’ which has seen young White (exclusively White) girls plied with alcohol and sedatives by Pakistani gangs and then pimped to a wide network of similar creatures.

So you see, dear reader, a case can be made that Islamic immigration not only imports the familiar curses of misogyny, homophobia and Anti-Semitism, but racism too. I should be clear in finishing that not every Iranian, Arab or Pakistani is guilty of racial hatred, and that is not the argument being put forward. I am merely pointing out that the Islamic world is infected as badly with ‘racism’ as anywhere else, and is possibly even worse. The Western world has made huge leaps forward to the point where racism is only possible underground or in private; A situation markedly different to that of modern Tehran, Cairo, and Karachi.

D, LDN.