On the EDL, the BNP and the Difference Between Them.

Tags

BNP, Counter-Jihad, Defend the modern world, Demographics of Europe, English Defence League, Eurabia, Far-right politics, Jessica Ennis, Nick Griffin, Tommy Robinson

I’ve loved the English Defence League from the moment of its inception. After years of the anti-Islam cause being copyrighted by the ‘blood and honour’ lunatics of the Far-Right, here at last was a collective to stand just as ferociously against the Islamist tide as the BNP, but at the same stroke commit themselves to Britain in its modern, multiracial, capitalist reality.

This was a first in British, and arguably European political history; a splintering of the ‘far-right’ away from biological nationalism towards the grander domain of culture.

Since then, I’ve done my best to support them, writing about them frequently and defending them from the (predictable yet incessant) accusations of the Liberal-Left. I’ve never been part of an EDL procession myself, but I’ve witnessed them from the sidelines many times. They seem to be wonderful affairs, loudly despised by everyone I oppose. True to its ideals, the EDL on parade contains quite a mixture of social types. Just go along and see them and you’ll find young and old, Black and White, straight and gay, Christian and Sikh, Jew and Gentile etc… all united for a common end. Not since the early days of Communism could such a phenomenon have organically occurred so often.

The EDL leadership is preferable to that of the traditional Right too. Tommy Robinson/Stephen Lennon may not be an eloquent, academic type, but he seems perfectly sincere in his beliefs and pleasant in their expression. He’s never denied the Holocaust, or involved himself on matters of race-relations, or called into question the validity of the Capitalist system. He’s just a patriotic, affable young man who wants Britain to go back to how it once was, by which he means how it was in the 1980s and 1990s before the Blair-wave of immigration, and not, like Mr Griffin, back to the Victorian era.

Every time Tommy Robinson is interviewed on Newsnight, I like to imagine Nick Griffin sitting at home with his rottweilers and a large glass of scotch, seething at the screen. He must loathe the attention heaped on this young man, and more than this, he must resent the ability of his organisation to get boots on the street in a way the BNP could never do.

But it isn’t just personalities that divide EDL and BNP, but principles too. The ideological differences between the two groups are worth returning to again and again. Despite the myths and fables put about by Liberal crazies, they really are nothing like each other.

To understand why, consider two cases of modern British ‘diversity’; first, the mixed-race athlete Jessica Ennis, and secondly, the British-based Jordanian preacher Abu Qatada. These aren’t two names you’ll often read in the same paragraph as each other let alone sentence, but stay with me on this one….

According to BNP ideology, the former, as a product of Black-White miscegenation, represents as much of a threat to British survival as the latter, perhaps even more. The latter by contrast could even be considered an ally against the famous ‘Jewish conspiracy’  deemed responsible for the very climate of ‘race-mixing’ in which beautiful creatures like Ms Ennis are created.

For the EDL, the second is an anti-Semitic crank and national-security threat who should be immediately deported, while the first is the opposite of a threat; she is a reason to hoist the flag higher and sing the anthem with greater enthusiasm.

Do you understand? The BNP is a blind alley. Only fools are still found running up it. The EDL, together with parties friendly to it like Liberty GB, are a surer bet, and though I don’t like to invest much hope in any political force, perhaps together they can be the answer we’ve been waiting for.

D, LDN.

This Afternoon.

Tags

Counter-Jihad, Defend the modern world, Eurabia, Islam and the West, Islamisation of London, london, Machete, Multiculturalism, Soldier Terrorism

It appears that a soldier has been beheaded on the streets of London this afternoon.

Although I’m anything but ‘surprised’, the cruelty of the act still defies belief.

I should never have to write about beheadings, nor even contemplate them happening so close to my home. Such events were typical of London two hundred years ago. This is 2013. Fatalities like this are the violent tax we pay on importing those from another century.

Do not blame the political climate for this. That climate includes everyone. I am entirely innocent of this man’s brave and wasted blood, as are you. It is our leaders who are guilty and we must be clear about this from the start. For the last fifteen years, the British political class has imported the most hideous depravity into one of the birthplaces of the modern age. Now these opposite forces are coming to war with each other in a way so natural it barely merits detailed analysis.

The most simple elements are also the most fundamental and contradictory. Light repels dark, good repels evil, and modernity should repel barbarism; There is no coexistence possible for concepts so starkly and absolutely opposed.

As for a motivation for this latest murder, don’t flatter the savages by looking for one. Anyone who has a political mind will have already decided their position on Islam in the Western world. We should now stand back and let the (non-political) masses soak in the events of today and trust them to draw the right conclusions.

I for one hope this spitting on the fabric of British Patriotism acts as a more general ’wake-up call’, compelling us to act faster and with greater mental clarity than before. I hope the EDL make some sort of appearance when it is respectful and right for them to do so. I also hope that the right-wing and left-wing can unite on something so basic and important as the lives of British soldiers and condemn this action together.

Lastly, I hope for popular decorum and an atmosphere of respect. If you’re already on the intelligent side of the Islam debate, the temptation when something like this happens is to feel ‘smug’… But this is too close to feeling ‘good’, and how can anyone feel ‘good’ about today?

D, LDN.

Islamophobia Contra Racism.

Tags

Counter-Jihad, Counterjihad, Cultural Marxism, Defend the modern world, Demographics of Europe, English Defence League, Eurabia, Islamization, Islamophobia, No to Turkey in the EU, Rihanna Muslim

If you make a perfectly sensible criticism of Islam or Muslims these days, dissent typically returns in the form of a charge of bigotry, and specifically, of ‘racism’.

It would be easy to dismiss this out of hand. Leftists after-all are known to be cynical and to resort to defamation when their arguments fail. But this charge – unusually - does have some foundation in reality, even if only a shaky one.

There are people who pretend to dislike the culture and violence of the Muslim world, but whose feelings are actually based on a dislike of the shape of Arab noses, the shade of Afghan skin or the consistency of Turkish hair. This is hardly surprising. Such people were with us long before 9/11. They’ve been with us since Ancient Rome. They are commonly known as ‘Racists’ – itself a worn-out and abused word but one that nevertheless captures what is to be condemned about them. ’Racists’ are those who discriminate on the basis of biology. Such people are typically shallow, hateful and often violent. Very few of them can string a sentence together. Most importantly, few if any of them enjoy political influence.

I am decisively not a racist. In fact, I energetically oppose racism, whether social or political. It’s lazy, uncivilised, un-English, and almost always indicative of a broader dysfunction in the individual practicing it. As for the racial groups affected by Islam, they have often produced people of enormous merit (although only when the Sharia police relaxed long enough for them to achieve anything). I don’t believe Arabians, Afghans and Persians are ’stupid’ or ‘ugly’ or genetically predisposed to any negative attribute at all. That is precisely why I am Islamophobic and not Racist. A racist would be content with saying that Afghanistan is a hellish place because Afghan people are degenerate or sub-human. The Islamophobe explains that it is culture which holds the people of Afghanistan back, as well as the people of Iraq, Syria, Iran and Egypt, and not ethnicity or genetics.

Now let’s define – Islamophobia. This word is rumored to have been purposely designed by political Islamists in the 1960s. Although that would make sense, I have no way of verifying this claim at the moment, so let’s forget it’s origin and focus on its meaning. The word ‘Phobia’ by-itself denotes a fear or aversion to something. It isn’t, contrary to popular belief, always an ‘irrational’ aversion, since many phobias (Arachnophobia,  etc..) have roots in rational experience. Some spiders can kill you, but you are wrong to believe that all spiders automatically amount to a threat. I suppose in this light, Islamophobia appears a rational and sensible phrase. It’s true that not every Muslim is a terrorist, so it’s justified to call anyone seeking blanket solutions to the Muslim threat Islamophobes right?

Wrong.

I am not, and never have been, afraid of terrorism. The day after the London Bombings, I used the London subway without a care in the world. Statistically speaking, the chances of being on a tube-line targeted by terrorists is absurdly small. Then one must factor in the chances of being on the specific train, and then in the affected carriage etc, and the fear vanishes almost entirely.

What I am afraid of is the Islamisation of my city and country. This fear justifies my unease with any practicing Muslim, moderate or extreme, liberal or conservative, after their community reaches a certain size. The more Muslims there are, the more Mosques there will be. The more Mosques, the more community centres, and Islamic bookshops. The more Muslim women, the more veils. The larger the Muslim community, the greater the number of proselytizers and morality squads confiscating alcohol. And on and on….

Clear enough? If not, I can compact my entire reasoning into a phrase if it helps -

I oppose letting a large community of people live in a city built upon values they despise and desire to destroy.

There. That is my argument in a nutshell. It is also the argument of millions within the Counter-Jihad tendency. Not once have I needed to touch upon race. Not once have I mentioned nationality. If it is a ’prejudice’ then it is a purely cultural one. The Western way of life has as much right to be protected in the West, as the Islamic way of life has to be protected in Pakistan.

Some wacky moralists, imprisoned wives and mutilated daughters might even say the West has a greater right.

D, LDN.

The UKIP Deception.

Tags

Counter-Jihad, Counterjihad, Cultural Marxism, Defend the modern world, Demographics of Europe, English Defence League, Islamification of Britain, Nigel Farage, UK Independence Party, UKIP, Zionism

The previous fortnight has seen the United Kingdom Independence Party carry out its first ideological purge. No less than three councilors have now been removed from their elected posts for comments made on social networks, all of which (bar one anti-Semitic incident) involved Islam.

I know that many people invest extremely high hopes in UKIP and its charismatic leader Nigel Farage. They believe the Eurosceptic party will achieve what the BNP could never do; namely, move the argument for cultural preservation from the wild wings of the internet into the political mainstream. I have never held this belief myself, and the latest actions by the UKIP leadership serve to confirm my suspicions.

UKIP is a Thatcherite party, little more, little less. Thatcherism, as an intellectual tendency is largely economics-based and culturally agnostic. Its adherents are more interested in affluence than churches, oil than Israel, skyscrapers than cohesion.

Thatcher’s ideas were never about patriotism. There was nothing patriotic about gutting the coal-mining capability of this country. Economic sense is not patriotic sense. The two logical systems are different and often in conflict with one another.

With this in mind then, who should be surprised in the slightest that UKIP appears intolerant of the anti-Islam movement? 

Many decent and passionate people are here being deceived by the media. There is a lot of mocked-up outrage at UKIP’s weak and watery immigration policy. UKIP’s manifesto proposes a ‘breather period’ of zero economic immigration for five years. While this is obviously sensible (and no doubt extremely popular), it’s wise to remember that most immigration currently comes from Eastern-European countries, not from Asia and Africa. The non-European population of Britain (including Muslims) originates in waves of migration that happened over ten years ago. The real and perceived growth of these communities is actually ‘natural’, by which demographers mean – due to reproduction.

UKIP’s policies therefore cannot do anything whatsoever to address the Islamisation of Britain demographically. Adequate base material for that process is already here. With Natives refusing to breed, Muslim expansion doesn’t ultimately require immigration.   

So, what about the cultural battleground? Here, I suppose, UKIP might be of greater use than on the demographic issue. Nigel Farage is adamant that his party represents traditional British values. He is often seen in pubs drinking ale; a situation too repetitive to be natural (unless Farage is a functioning alcoholic), and so these photo-ops must be for a reason. They are designed no doubt, to convey a ‘man of the people’, British to the bootstraps. I have never to-this-day seen Farage in a Mosque, or an Asian community centre, or clad in diplomatic leather at a gay rights parade, and I’m unlikely to witness any of these things either, as Mr Farage seems to deal with the multi-cultural reality of Britain by ignoring it entirely.

This could be good or bad and I’m not yet sure which.

On the one hand, Mr Farage is implying he is a Briton of the old school- a kind of 1930′s, ale-drinking, hard-working, German-hating Man’s Man. On the other, he is giving the impression of complete disinterest in cultural issues foreign to that old school, the most recent and important of which being the Islamic takeover of England.

UKIP are currently riding high in the polls. Should this persist, they will undoubtedly gain seats in parliament at the next general election. Mr Farage may think it essential to this momentum to pluck out the ‘rotten apples’ from the UKIP barrel. He would be advised however, not to chuck out the reason for this ascendency with them.

D, LDN.

Our Allies in Malaysia.

Tags

Armenia, Barisan Nasional, Buddhists, Counter-Jihad, Defend the modern world, English Defence League, Eurabia, Greek Cypriots, Hindu, Indonesia, Islam, Malaysia

I noted the other week that one of my posts was shared (approvingly) on an anti-Islam website in Malaysia. I consequently enjoyed many hundred visitors to this blog from that country and this left me confused (and happy of course, but still….). I had always assumed Malaysia to be a purely Islamic country like Indonesia, and possessed with a similar religious fervour. I was completely wrong of course, as I later found out from reading about the country online.

Malaysia is a country rarely mentioned in Western Media. While this may be understandable from a purely geographic point of view (Malaysia being a distant and small territory), it isn’t justified from a geo-strategic one. Roughly 60% of the Malaysian population professes the religion of Islam. The remainder are a mixture of Buddhists, Christians, Confucians and Hindus. Despite centuries of coexistence, the Muslim and non-Muslim sections of society are increasingly coming into collision with one another. The Muslims are said to enjoy a plethora of political and economic advantages over the rest of society stemming from the fact that Islam remains the only legally-endorsed ‘state-religion’ in the constitution. Religious minorities by contrast, have to fight for freedoms against the current (even if not the explicit content) of the law.

It’s time Western Counter-Jihad activists took more of an interest in the welfare of these people. The Malaysian Kaffir have struggled for many decades, without significant allies, against the same force that Armenians, Greek Cypriots, and Maronite Christians have opposed more famously and with greater coverage.

There are no limits to Jihad. Bin Laden was very clear that he intended to create a borderless curse on all coherent societies. Malaysia is no different from Armenia in this struggle. They both contain battlelines either side of which are violent Muslims and those they seek convert or enslave.

D, LDN.

How I became Islamophobic.

Tags

Christianity and Islam, Counter-Jihad, Cultural Marxism, Defend the modern world, Eurabia, Islam, Islamophobia, Multiculturalism, Muslim, New York City, No to Turkey in the EU, Radiohead, Valentine's Day, Warwick University, White nationalism

“We’re not scaremongering, this is really happening.” – Idioteque, Radiohead.

My University in London used to be a Polytechnic. Before that, it was a parking lot. By gradients then, the same space has become progressively less functional over the ages, and it now blights the cultural life of an otherwise charming town.

In appearance, the main building resembles a very old-fashioned, inner-city high-school. The campus is tiny relative to normal universities. There is no green space nearby and we are surrounded on all sides by busy roads. The website calls it ‘cosy, modern and artful’. In reality it is compact, ugly and depressing.

I didn’t need to attend this place. I received very good A-level results. Warwick University was among the first institutions to offer me a place. I turned them and others down because I wanted to attend somewhere further away from the small, boring town in which my parents live. More specifically, I was determined to live and study in London.

What I had in mind was the London I saw on television; a stuffy, slightly upmarket New York in effect, with intelligent men and aspirant women supping cocktails and espresso, you know the kind of place. What I have become used to since I arrived here is a city of burkas, terrorism, homophobia, black-tar Heroin, and prostitution; a magnificent metropolis half-destroyed by a single cultural minority.

You may think, dear general reader, that the panic and hysteria over Islam is unwarranted or driven by third-party interests (oil politics, Jewish Nationalism, Racism etc…). The ‘me’ just a day or two into freshers week would completely agree with you. The ‘me’ now wants you to listen carefully and without prejudice as to why this is not the case.

I realise now that the present epoch is a contest between two starkly different futures: One in which the West is Islamised and the other in which the West is restored. The first is a nightmare of which some of us already have a taste, and which we are fully prepared to fight to prevent.

I’ll give you three examples of the trend from personal experience…

During my first year of study, I was resident in a student halls with many other people, most of them Muslim, most of them British-born. Throughout this year I witnessed (and on occasion, suffered) cultural bullying of a type I never imagined existed. This was the bullying routinely talked about on racist websites, and which I had always assumed to be Islamophobic fiction.

Here’s a question for you – In what situation do you think it is appropriate to label a women you don’t know a ‘slag’? I’m sure, assuming you are a decent and rational person, that you would only imagine yourself using such language during a fit of rage over something like a terrible betrayal, or after being physically attacked by a female stranger…..

Well, the non-Muslim women of my block grew used to hearing this word in retribution for such crimes as wearing shorts on their way to netball practice. They became used to hearing it when they went out in groups to local nightclubs and when they returned home in the early hours of the morning. They hardly blinked when such slurs were screamed out of windows, day-in and day-out, and it went unreported.

Here’s another question for you – In what situation do you think it is justified to spread lies about people you barely know?

Well, lies of the most serious and defamatory kind were routinely spread about non-Muslim students by Muslims that year, via intranet email, graffiti and loud insinuation. The women (the ‘slags’) were alleged to be infected with sexual diseases. The boys were alleged to be homosexual and/or riddled with AIDS. The ‘evidence’ for such slurs were the lifestyles of the Kaffir – their attending of parties, easy laughter and congregating with people of the opposite sex etc…  

Here’s a second example….

On St Valentine’s Day during the second year, the Student Union decided to propose a Valentine’s Day Singles Ball to which men would come wearing badges saying ‘single’ to meet women who would be identified likewise. It sounded quite silly I remember thinking, but if people enjoyed it, who cared?

You don’t need me to tell you who cared about it, and who eventually protested loudly enough for the Ball to be cancelled. It was the ****** University Islamic Society, a sprawling and powerful mafia with tentacles reaching into every aspect of student life. They thought the ball would encourage promiscuity and so they lobbied against it.

Again, nobody said a word.

A third and final example I’ll give of my awakening is the most serious. You might well dismiss what you’ve read so far as ‘anti-social’ behaviour and no worse than that of other social groups, but not this occasion:

I was sitting in class one day, near the back of the room. The lecturer had finished talking and now we were told to discuss amongst ourselves the things we’d heard. A group of Muslim men just across from me were apparently uninterested in the lecture that day as they commenced to discuss videos they’d been emailing each other instead. It took me a short while, but I came to understand that these were decapitation videos. After hearing words and descriptions that I never want to repeat, I nervously looked over at the faces of the men and saw sick, sadistic smiles curling up their bearded faces.

At the end of that year, I was a fully developed ‘Islamophobe’. I can’t and won’t deny what I witnessed and what I saw others go through. And more than this, I won’t help the taboo to survive which allowed for these abuses to go unreported.

If there is one thing my University made clear during Fresher’s Week, it was the ‘multi-faculty policy on discrimination’. In lengthy assemblies, we were told that no ‘discrimination’ of any kind was tolerated longer than it took for those responsible to be expelled.

A climate of fear, no less palpable than that of totalitarian dictatorship was cast over us all.

You’ll notice that I haven’t provided you with the name of my University. This is because I am currently studying there and do not wish to be beaten to a pulp by students. I wouldn’t trust the staff or security to help me in such a situation. This University is Islamic territory now.

The people I hope to reach are those who might have any illusions about the determination of the Muslims to enforce their way of life onto the rest of us. It is not a ‘Zionist fabrication’. It is not a ‘fantasy’ of White Nationalists.  I am a perfectly liberal guy, and have a zero-tolerance policy for racism.

The threat is real.

D, LDN.

Prelude to a Second American Civil War?

Tags

American Civil War, Counter-Jihad, Defend the modern world, Glenn Beck, Gun Control, National Rifle Association, Rihanna Muslim, Tyranny, United States, Western world

Anyone who saw Glenn Beck’s performance at the NRA convention last week will struggle to describe it in words. On the one hand, the former Fox-contributor was ridiculous, over-emotive, faux-Shakespearean and tended to ramble on from one point to the next rather than focus on the issue he was invited to speak about. On the other hand, he was eminently convincing in his case that firearms and the right of the common man to own them was something above the merely political. It involved, he suggested, one of the naked, pre-political liberties of mankind – the right to defend one’s family, and given that this right precedes politics, he argued, nobody should dare threaten it but that they rightly be called a tyrant.

And with this, I wholeheartedly agree. Beck, however, is a difficult man to agree with. He can embarrass an argument as well as he can express one. And at the NRA convention, Beck provided a lot of unnecessary amateur dramatics. His voice occasionally trembled for decorum and then, just as easily (and artificially) rose with a preacher’s emphasis for applause and confirmation. It’s difficult to keep Beck on track at a live event, but look at his speech in transcript form, and you’ll find much more to engage with.

Beck didn’t mention it explicitly, but the language of ‘civil war’ ran implicitly through his entire speech. His rhetoric about being ready to ‘stand and fight’ hardly needs elaborating upon. Nor does his use of the iconography of soldiers and historic battles. The audience knew what he meant. They whooped and cheered on cue and off, intimating that they understood him, tone and undertone.

It is the undertones which concern me most.

A political tendency is developing in America which, unless some concerted effort is made to arrest it, will bring the prospect of a very damaging civil conflict into view. This tendency is based on a growing doubt that the elected Obama administration is the rightful government of the United States. There are Americans, many of them decent and rational to their bone-marrow, who do not believe that ‘America’ elected Barack Obama, either in 2008 or 2012. They believe that an alien coalition of Mexicans, Africans and Cubans elected him, after he bribed them with their money.

The fact that they’re not entirely wrong doesn’t help us here. Of course the Democrats have engineered immigration policy with the electoral college in mind. Nobody disputes this. But if this belief is followed through to its logical end, we may end up with a catastrophe.

America is not an ordinary country. It is the greatest nation in the Western World. American innovation created and secured the mechanics of democratic capitalism, which itself defeated both Communism and Fascism to ensure that mankind remained free, and that the democratic idea became a global standard. A modern history without America would have seen politics reduced to a question of allegiance between Berlin or Moscow. A choice (if it is one) from hell.

Given this indispensability, everyone the world over has a right to be concerned about America’s internal affairs. With Islamism lapping at European shores and autocratic Russian and Chinese states rising to ever greater economic might, the need for a stable, united, and confident America is increasing.

And yet it is at this point in history that America risks falling to pieces. One cannot now bet safely against a major civil implosion in certain American states. The most likely catalyst for the beginning of a Second American Civil War would (let’s not say ‘will’ just yet), probably be the next election. If the republicans fail to win in 2016, then that really is it for the party of Reagan. After this, people may start looking for primordial, pre-political solutions.

And in case you don’t know what that entails, I refer you back to Mr Beck’s speech.

D, LDN.

Egalitarianism: The Future of an Illusion.

Tags

Bell Curve, Black people, Defend the modern world, Detroit, Intelligence quotient, John Derbyshire, Race and ethnicity in the United States Census, racism, racism and pornography, United States

This week I was browsing the website Vdare.com on my mobile phone and chanced upon a link to an article by the writer John Derbyshire. You may never have heard his name before, but there’s a slight chance you may have heard of one of his more controversial articles: ‘The Talk: Nonblack Version’. This particular piece has now passed into the political-correctors hall of shame, alongside cultural events like the The Bell Curve, Mein Kampf, and Race, Evolution and Behaviour.

I’ll put a link to the original article at the close of this one, but in case you don’t fancy reading it, I’ll summarise it here. ‘The Talk’ is a phrase apparently common among Black parents in the United States. It denotes the conversation they must inevitably have with their growing children about the issue of race, and especially about White racism.

Somewhat indignant about this, Mr Derbyshire took to writing a White version of ‘The Talk’ in which the reader is to imagine the words being spoken to a young White youth instead of a Black one.

Whilst the Black version of ‘The Talk’ is imagined to typically consist of dark and exaggerated warnings about the workings of the evil White community, Derbyshire’s inverts this and cautions the hypothetical youth against the danger of such things as wandering into Black areas at night, or stopping to listen when ‘accosted in the street by a Black’, or of the gap in intelligence between the two races….

You don’t need me to tell you which of those examples became the most controversial.

The issue of Race and Intelligence is apparently destined never to be settled. One cannot even raise it without risk to ones reputation or career. Scientists, including those in the relevant fields, are all too keen to change the subject when asked about it, and few pursue studies of the issue, (if they do, the final papers are laden with firefighting qualifications before and afterward.)

As for me, I like controversy, so it’ll do me no harm to talk about such matters here.

Are the races generally equal in cognitive ability? No. Of course they aren’t. But then nobody really believes that they are. Social manners dictate that we pretend they are in public, but in private, everyone of every racial background knows there are wild intellectual distances between the ethnic groups. And it isn’t just evident on IQ tests, but can be seen in everyday life too.

Just the other week I was sitting in a fast-food restaurant in Hammersmith when the table next to mine was suddenly leapt upon by a group of about 6 Black youths. They were, in appearance, aged around 18 to twentysomething years old, and were riotously trying to hold a six-way conversation with each other.

I’d already finished my ‘meal’, and was just waiting to stand and leave, but I was feeling lazy and so I sat for a few more minutes and listened to these people talk……

What I find most curious is that nobody else finds the conversations these people have curious. They aren’t like those held by any other ethnic type. No member of the group ever had the chance to complete a sentence. Each guy just kept shouting whenever anything like silence emerged from between the shouts of the others. Since words weren’t getting through, some of them started to make extended noises in order to bring the centre of gravity over to them. One of them kept going “Ohhhhhhhhhhhhh……Ohhhhhhhhhhh..Ohhhhhhh.” Another tried with “Whoaaahhh…Whoaahh.”. Another kept repeating “Listen but, listen but, listen but….”

They carried on like this, with each obstructing the communication of the other for about five minutes. At this point I had to leave as one of them, his mouth full, became so enthused by his enjoyment of the food that he commenced to dancing ecstatically between the tables.

I don’t think it’s honest to say that I find this a shared behaviour identical in portion within all ethnic groups. I would be truly shocked if a group of British-born Chinese, Jewish, Turkish, Arabic, Hispanic or Indian youths, even school-kids, behaved in that way in public.

But then perhaps the fault here is my own. You might justly ask why haven’t I been shocked before at the bizarre behaviour of young Black men and women? It hasn’t been my liberalism or cowardice. A more probable reason is captured by the phrase “the racism of low expectations’.

If I or society truly believe that races are equal, then should we not be free to confront those crazy youths and bar them from public places? Should we not be allowed to ask for social services to investigate whether those youths are retarded and need greater supervision? And if not, why not?

The answer is that we expect nothing more from them. Or at least, that we aren’t surprised by their behaviour, which amounts to the same thing.

We put off thinking about these things, because to think about these things can be painful.

For me more than others. I do not self-identify as ‘White’, although much of my ancestry is European. I have other infusions which conspire to give me a Latin complexion. My skin is fair, but I wouldn’t call it ‘White’. More than this, the word ‘White’ means nothing by-itself. I self-identify rather as English. But then, my endorsement of the civic-nationalist argument does not cancel out my awareness of  race. True, I’d rather not think about it at all. It dehumanises people to place them in categories, and it goes against my liberal instincts too. But if we adopt full colour-blindness, I’m scared about where my England will end up.

And how far can society actually go before it is forced to acknowledge racial truths? In America, the birthplace of modern multi-racial democracy, the conversation may have to be had sooner even than in Europe.

The city of Detroit, Michigan is for White, race-conscious Americans, a terrifying prophecy of the future. Historically this city was a Germanic, mostly-White, car-making boom-town. After the great-migrations of African-Americans from the South, the white population fled, first to one end of the city, then, after a massive race-riot, to the suburbs around the city and finally after a second race-riot, began to leave the whole metropolitan area.

Detroit is now almost entirely Black, and has become the most dangerous, violent, and deprived city in North America. The residential areas have fallen into third-world condition. Abandoned houses stand next to burned-out houses, closed hardware stores next to blasted and looted ones.

Americans deep-down, know why this has happened. In public, they will tell you it is because of the collapse of the local car-making industry, but the local car-making industry did not support the entire civilised spirit of the city any more than banking supports New York or London. Remove financial services from London and you still have a thriving economic force based around other services, construction and the arts. The same is true of Los Angeles, Paris, Milan and Berlin. No ‘city’ depends on one industry. A town maybe, but not a city.

In truth, the car-making industry was the last White refugee from Detroit. The cars are still being made, but somewhere else now. With White and Asian-American economic talent gone, the city is going quickly rotten. Gangs are taking over. There are running gun-battles echoing around the feet of skyscrapers.

Could this be the American future? Quite plausibly.

But if this is a disease I would hate to see it cured fully. Multi-racialism is not just a fact of life (and of modernity) but a salient fact of the world as it is. There are more people in the world than Europeans. Many non-Europeans have as much or more to offer.

Let there be no confusion – blind egalitarianism does not only mug White people. It also mugs other races of the right to be proud of their superiorities.

Returning to end where we began, I genuinely think there may be such a thing as an ‘optimum IQ’ – that is, an IQ that is best suited to life on planet earth and which is best capable of fulfilling the duties of reproduction, civilization and the creation of public happiness. I don’t believe such an IQ is typical at Harvard or Oxford. Extremely high intelligence is like an untethered helium balloon lifting one away from the vital plane of real existence.  In places like Scandinavia, the natives have some of the highest IQs in the world. The same is true of Japan. But these societies are at the end of their history. Nothing of interest happens anymore. The birth-rate is through the floor.

The music, art and babies of the future are being made by those who still occupy the lower, dirtier but more vital world.

Food for thought.

D, LDN.

Muslim Fear of Sex.

Tags

Cultural Marxism, Defend the modern world, English Defence League, Eurabia, Islam, Islamification of Britain, Islamisation of London, Multiculturalism, Women in Islam

I haven’t giggled since I was a child. I’ve laughed of course, and chuckled and wheezed and bawled, but I haven’t giggled for longer than I can remember.

Giggling is a curious and revealing reaction to stimuli in that it doesn’t equate to one being amused but rather disturbed. Giggling is a way of covering up fear, embarrassment and lack of understanding.

I’m pretty fascistic about who I let into my personal life and so I haven’t heard a friend or valued associate giggle for some time either. My friends are too mature for that. If they are intimidated by a subject (which is rare), they’ll brace themselves and let curiosity play surrogate for courage. “Tell me more…”

The last time I witnessed giggling from a fully grown adult was during my first year at University. I’ve written about this period elsewhere on this blog. It was one of the most tense and degrading years of my adult existence. I was placed into a student residential block with around 12 other students. I would say about 9 of them were Muslim. Those who weren’t (excluding myself) were uncommunicative Eastern Europeans.

As you would expect from this author, I kept as much of a distance as I could manage from the believers, but I still inevitably ran into them on occasion.

Whenever they tried to ingratiate themselves with me, I found the best and most reliable method of repelling them to be to mention sex. Whenever I mentioned any decidedly heterosexual topic, the Muslims began, in chorus, to giggle like children and then try to change the subject.

I noted that they seemed to hate talking about women; whether the beauty of women, the anatomy of women, or the existence of women etc…..

Mentioning the fairer sex seemed to act as a social pesticide. The word ‘vagina’ (actually a rather beautiful word) in particular they found to be ‘disgusting’ and it reliably sent them indoors.

This was curious to me then, but not to me now. As anyone who has read social studies of Muslims in the West knows, Western Muslims are especially tortured by the issue of sexuality. They are told by their religion that all aspects of sexuality are to be strictly limited to procreation and marriage, and yet they are growing up in a civilization which celebrates sex, sexiness, beauty and even perversion. As a consequence, their personalities are thrown into riot.

Muslim men (despite what their behaviour suggests) are human beings. When they are young, they have urges just like anyone else. They are also often members of racial groups with strikingly beautiful women. But they are powerless to act. They are forced by circumstance to live in a banqueting hall, and forced by their culture to starve themselves.

You may recall some time ago, there was a Muslim plot to blow up the Tiger Tiger nightclub in London. A taped phone conversation was released after the plot was foiled in which the would-be terrorists discussed their reasoning for selecting this venue. Much of what they said corresponded to a complete lack of sexual understanding. They equated scantily dressed women to adulterers, and promiscuous men to homosexuals. Labels were thrown around with zero respect for their meaning. Religion itself was barely touched upon.

In order to face the Muslim threat, we need to understand much more than the religious motivations of those who hate us. It is all too often the case that Muslims attack not because they feel supreme, but because – deep down – they know they are inadequate.

D, LDN.

Russell Howard: A Case Study in Liberal Hypocrisy.

Tags

British National Party, Counter-Jihad, Death of the West, Defend the modern world, EDL, English Defence League, Leamington Spa, Multiculturalism, Muslims, Russell Howard, Russell Howard's Good News

In order to understand how best to awaken people to the Islamist threat, it seems increasingly rewarding to focus less on theory and statistics, and more on image and communication.

The Islamisation argument has been won statistically for some time. Nobody has managed to seriously dispute the projections put forward in ‘America Alone’ by Mark Steyn or ‘The Death of the West’ by Pat Buchanan, and they’ve had a lot of time to find a decent reply. The guns fell silent long ago in the theoretical battle too. A great thudding broadside from Christopher Caldwell sent the opposition into a screaming death-spiral of contradiction and lies.

But we are still far from winning the greater war – the one for hearts and minds. A majority of the population still oppose us, disagree with us, hate us even.

This is because (unfortunately for us), a majority in any modern, liberal democracy do not read political books, or analyse statistics, or philosophise about future demographic scenarios at all. They are too busy doing other things, like listening to music, playing sport and above-all, watching television.

The battlefield of the future therefore is popular culture. It is the vast, green distance separating our trench from that of the Islamists. Theory and statistics are yesterday’s combat. Further sociological or demographic analysis, even of the most pristine and original kind, will not advance the front-line any further.

With this in mind then, let us examine a case study of an opposition soldier on this new battlefield: The Left-Wing comedian Russell Howard. His views I find, are typical of the liberal trend in entertainment and media, and his hypocrisies should prove familiar too.

Russell Howard is a known face to almost everyone in this country (the UK). He was a regular on Mock the Week, a very popular left-leaning political panel show on BBC2, and now has his own show ‘Russell Howard’s Good News’, a comic retrospective of the past weeks headlines which regularly tops the ‘most viewed’ chart on BBC Iplayer.

Both of these shows grant Howard a forum to air his worldview, which is quintessentially liberal and also exactly hypocritical.

I haven’t selected Howard out of any special contempt for his person. He seems a perfectly nice man, capable at his craft, and his political views, however warped, are likely rooted in a pleasant nature. Some time ago however, I saw him interviewed on Jonathan Ross in which he let slip some details about his personal life that made me lose all respect for his political commentary.

Howard has made a big thing in the past of bashing both the English Defence League and the British National Party. The latter he’s right and free to bash till the cows come home. His critique of the former however has grated with me ever since I learned where the young comic lives: Leamington Spa in Warwickshire.

Leamington Fucking Spa.

Now, one might safely call someone a hypocrite for living in Kensington and then lecturing Northerners about how lovely Muslims are. But then Kensington has at least seen an influx of Iranians over the years and is now home to many mosques and ‘cultural centres’. There still aren’t enough Muslims to absolve West-London Leftists of the charge of hypocrisy, but at least they are getting a small sample of the package enforced in full on other cities.

Such hypocrisy has nothing on Mr. Howard. He ridicules those native people living in Islamised areas from one of the most prosperous and monocultural regions in the European Union. Leamington Spa is an extremely white, totally non-urban, totally safe, totally Middle-Class enclave. There are Muslims there of course, but as a town it is, unlike London or Birmingham, safely detached from any truly Islamic environment.

Before the Jonathon Ross interview, I’d naturally presumed Mr. Howard would live in London. That’s where he works after all. But no, he commutes in and out of the multicultural experiment at his leisure. How lucky!

When the EDL return home after a march, they often go back to war-torn urban sprawls, divided by religion, economics and race. After a stand-up show ridiculing the EDL in London, Howard goes home to a region of serene peace and social harmony. His bedroom window looks out onto a picture of unenriched olde England; a wonderland most working class families cannot afford.

OK, OK, perhaps I’m being a little unfair. Howard remarked that he lives in Leamington Spa largely because of his long-time girlfriend and this, for all I know, may be true. But should he still not appreciate how fortunate he is to live there and be made to acknowledge why he (and his social type) fare better there than in say, Bethnal Green or Sparkbrook?

I attend University in London. During my first year I witnessed many young White guys enter halls of residence as chirpy, pleasant, friendly people, many of them in some ways like Howard himself. After a month or two of living with largely Pakistani ‘Brits’, they were either bullied social-wreckage, or else their personalities were completely remodeled to adapt to the brash, homophobic stupidity of the majority.

You can rest assured that these guys will not share Howard’s attitude about Muslims now.

Howard’s liberalism extends beyond his defense of Muslims. He also defends (as do I) the right of homosexuals to be free from persecution, and reaffirms the importance of protecting women from violence and harassment. But in order for him to be faithful to these principles, he must first heavily dilute his commitment to defending Islamisation, and yet he doesn’t. An Islamised Britain will have no ‘Gay Rights’ parades, or topless Feminist punk-bands, or at least it won’t have them for any longer than it takes the morality police to find and hang those involved.

Howard and I grew up in the same city, my dear beloved Bristol. For this reason, his attitude doesn’t surprise me too much. Most people in Bristol are overly pleasant, somewhat naïve and politically utopian. Bristol (as I’ve written about elsewhere) doesn’t have much of a race problem. Those immigrant communities which are there have usually proven of great value. Perhaps Howard’s entire life has conspired to keep him in the dark about life’s more difficult issues. I don’t know.

But we shouldn’t be shy in calling people like Mr Howard out on his hypocrisies. We should be polite when doing so of course, as we too share his unspoken preferences. Most of us would love to live in Leamington Spa. But, crucially, we would be honest about why we’d choose to live there over somewhere like Sparkbrook or Stoke-on-Trent. And most importantly of all, we wouldn’t have the cheek to, as Mr. Howard does, ridicule those condemned to live less fortunate lives.

D, LDN.