On the Barbarians in Cologne

Tags

America 911, American Liberty, Annoying things on facebook, assault, BBC, Britain First, Christianity and Islam, Civilisation, Coffee, cologne germany assaults, Counter-Jihad, Counterjihad, Defend the modern world, Demographics of Europe, facebook twitter, germany sex assaults, joe for, Merkel, Multiculturalism, Muslims, No to Turkey in the EU, Pegida, pegids, rapes, refugees in cologne germany, sex, sex assaults migrants refugees

“We are from Syria. You have to be nice to us. Merkel invited us.”

These were the infuriating words allegedly spoken by a refugee during a recent orgy of sexual intimidation in Cologne, Germany. On a single night, what has been described since as a ‘co-ordinated’ series of sexual assaults by Muslim migrants spread fear and terror through the streets of this picturesque, historic (and formerly peaceful) German city. Though some of the details are still sketchy (many of the women understandably remain in shock), the criminal behaviour reported should rightly put to bed the entire ‘debate’ over refugee settlement in Europe as a whole.

What do we know at this point? Well, according to the reports I’ve read, some of the men involved in this outrage are said to have plunged their hands down women’s skirts to feel their vaginas. Others tried to grasp hold of women’s breasts and attempted to lick or kiss them through the victim’s clothing. Apart from the quote above, few – if any – words were spoken during the assaults. The men simply saw something they wanted (they would say ‘-thing’ rather than ‘-one’), and felt compelled to take it, much like a child unthinkingly reaches for candy in a supermarket.

Of course, many native German men will have felt this same compulsion on occasion. It’s a regrettable part of being a man. But those men (almost all of them anyway) will have been prevented from carrying out such actions by important psychological forces; forces which seem to be wholly lacking in the Muslim mind; things like conscience, respect and social intelligence; elementary but apparently rare prerequisites of social order and civilisation. The Muslim filth who carried out the attacks haven’t developed these mental habits because they come from a region in which such habits are unnecessary.

In Afghanistan or Syria, you pick a woman, you don’t charm or fall in love with them. There, you acquire a woman in the same way you or I might acquire an apartment, a microwave or a Fiat Punto. In such environments, tact, charm and the very notion of romance is alien. A Fiat Punto isn’t your reason for being. You don’t have to respect it. You just want one, and so you get one.

In personality too, these men are thoroughly undeveloped. Socially, they are little more than children. Having been given no reason to, they have scarcely matured beyond the giggling infancy of pre-adolescence and still carry the stupid sense of entitlement we all had back at that stage of our lives. This explains the very sincere lack of understanding displayed in the quote above. Merkel invited them in, so they can take what they want while they stay.

This isn’t evil. This is simply what happens when you let cavemen wander into the modern world.

In Denmark and Norway, authorities seem to have conceded this reality and are now seeking to combat the problem directly. As you may have heard, Scandinavian social services are to hold ‘sexual etiquette’ classes for Muslim refugees. These classes are designed to instil modern sexual attitudes in the new arrivals, ‘just in case’ they might find the modern world ‘confusing’.

One can only imagine what these classes are like in practice…”If you see a woman you like, what do you do?”- “Yes. I like. So I take her as my wife now.” – “No, Abdul…”

As to whether we should be making any effort to bring Muslims up to the standards of Western civilisation is a question of taste, or of priorities. I would say such charity is the very height of generosity, but do we really owe our enemies that?

D, LDN

Who Knew?

Tags

Civilisation, Counter-Jihad, decadence, Defend the modern world, Detroit, Facebook, Imam, Iran, Islamisation, Islamism, masturbation, Multiculturalism, Muslims, Race and ethnicity in the United States Census, sex, sex and, sexuality, Turkey

According to a Turkish Imam, when men masturbate they risk impregnating their hands.

Once again… According to a Turkish Imam, when men masturbate they risk impregnating their hands.

Now, before you jump to any rash conclusions about the scientific basis on which this claim is made, I must inform you that the hands are only impregnated in the afterlife, and this explains the lack of earthly evidence with which the Imam might back up this theory in the present, terrestrial domain.

Though he has not been pressed much further on the matter, the idea he imparted has great implications for those who hope to survive death, and such people are understandably desperate for certain clarifications. For example, if the hands are pregnant, from what part of the body does the child emerge? Is morning sickness in the wrists?

It’s very easy to laugh at Islamic madness. Despite that, I thoroughly recommend it.

D, LDN.

Pain and Gain.

Tags

American Dream, American way of life, Bodybuilding, Dwayne, Feminism, Mark Wahlberg, Michael Bay, No pain no gain, Pain and Gain, Palm Trees, Philosophy, Positivity, Rock, sex, Steroids, Sunshine, Taylor Swift

I sat down to watch the Michael Bay crime-comedy ‘Pain and Gain’ with the iconoclastic reviewer Mark Kermode’s critique still ringing in my ears. As the journalist made more than clear, this was not a movie that appealed to him:

“(It) was absolutely loathsome and morally repugnant and vile and evil and bad.”, he sighed with his usual laid-back, folded arms, schoolmarmish shtick.

Having a lot of respect for Kermode’s judgement on this art-form, I fully expected to loathe the film myself. And ultimately, yes, it is a haphazard work in parts, filled with lumpy, half-digested ideas and jokes in questionable taste. But for the first half hour, it can’t be denied, I was strangely enthralled.

I won’t go into the plot. Just know that the story and the crimes depicted are based in fact and that it all grows increasingly ridiculous as things go on. I only want to talk here about the opening, because this is something that – even if it was meant satirically – struck a chord deep within me.

Mark Wahlberg’s character Daniel is the film’s narrator and for the first half an hour, he explains to the viewer exactly why America is great and how this relates down to the conduct and attitude of the individual.

He informs us that be believes in physical fitness, self-starting, body-building, masculinity and self-reliance. He notes by way of illustration the example of US history; the story of a colony that went on to dominate the world through guts, determination and a terrifying kind of self-belief.

As I say, this is all meant to be a satire on the American mindset, and the film later tries to make nonsense of the opening premise. Still, I found myself in agreement with every word Wahlberg’s character spoke. He described in a simple and powerful way, the aspects of America I most admire. I also think the linkage between physical fitness and philosophy is a valid one.

I took up bodybuilding a few years ago under the influence of the work of Yukio Mishima. I really don’t think there is a better or more virtuous hobby available to a person, especially to a man. Bodybuilding doesn’t just build muscle, it builds confidence and ambition. It opens doors in the mind. The increase in dopamine triggers goal-orientated behaviours. I can write a thousand words in one sitting after working out. I feel more sure of my views, less tolerant of doubt, moderation and of those who would dare oppose me. This is the way nature inspires us. With every kilo added to your routine, you justify yourself. Bodybuilding – unlike intellectualism – counts for something in the Darwinian game. I may be able to write well (or so I’ve been told) but what does literacy matter in the end? When the struggle is unleashed and the contenders amass, I won’t be writing the enemy to death. To be a man, one has to be prepared to be a brawler, a thug even.

A well-built body is the physical manifestation of a determined mind; it is the ‘will become flesh’ – to quote Mishima. It is also an ideal metaphor for the American can-do attitude that is infinitely superior to the drizzling self-deprecation of England.

D, LDN.

Notes on the Islamisation of London. I

Tags

Britain, Campus watch, Campuswatch, Christianity, Counter-Jihad, Defend the modern world, Demographics of Europe, EDL, Eurabia, Europe, Islam, Islamisation of London, london, Multiculturalism, sex

My first year at University was hellish. I didn’t kid myself it was anything other than hellish for long. No more than three weeks in, I realised that – by agreeing to study in residence at a Central London University – I’d pretty much consented to live in a third-world backwater for 12 months. I fell into a deep lethargy. I stayed in on most of the days when lectures were not scheduled. I drank massively to excess, almost to the point of straightforward alcoholism, and I ate little but pizzas and toast.

I should regret living like that. It’s below my pride. But until you know what it’s like for a naïve, hopelessly polite kid to live in what felt like a Pakistani youth detention centre for 12 months, you can’t understand the need for such obliteration. 

Anyway, On one of the rare occasions I wandered around my sprawling residential campus in a state of sobriety, I recall stopping to smoke a cigarette near where a boy and girl – one Asian, one native – were sitting on the grass, engaged in what looked like an intense conversation. The boy was doing much of the talking. The girl looked dutiful, awkward but maintained a pleasant facade.

“It’s clear as crystal, perfect and nourishing…’ – He was saying. When I heard the boy say this my English mind inevitably tried to restructure what he was saying into different possible metaphors for his phallus, but as he went on, this seemed less and less likely to be the case.

“It’s the most beautiful and pure stream. It’s from heaven. You can cure diseases with it…”

Now he couldn’t be that shameless…

“It described in the Qur’an.”

Ah. Eh? What the fellow was talking about I went on to grasp, was the ‘Zamzam’ wellspring in Mecca, and he was explaining to the girl the wonders associated with the water which flows from it.

I immediately felt sorry for her. She probably thought a British university was going to be the home of free-thinking intellectuals. But instead she had been cornered only a few weeks into her sentence… ahem, I mean her degree, by some amateur imam from Bolton.

For those who don’t know what Zamzam is, it is an Arabian desert spring mentioned in the Qur’an, and revered by Muslims, who gather water from it when they undertake the Hajj pilgrimage. Many bottles (genuine or otherwise) of the liquid are sold in the UK to members of the Muslim Asian community at markets and are billed as being able to bring health and other blessings upon consumption. The guy in this instance had purchased some earlier in the day.

After telling the girl to ‘wait there’ he skipped excitedly across to his tower block and then a few minutes later hopped out again carrying in his hand a clear, unlabeled plastic bottle.

“Wow!” The girl said as she held it in her hands. “Is that really from over there?” She seemed genuinely over-awed by it.

After that I went back inside and cracked open a few Kronenbourg. It wasn’t until my second year (my course is 4 years), when I was meandering by the entrance to my campus and saw the girl again that I remembered that encounter. She’s very different now. The flowing ginger hair I remember her having is now tied-up and hidden under black cloth. All her friends have changed colour. I’m told her name is different to the one she was born with, and that she seems tired.

As am I.  

D, LDN.

Conservatives have won the Islam-in-Europe debate…..But the young are already in a different world.

Tags

America 911, anti-Semitism, Ayn Rand, Birmingham, BNP, Bravery, Christianity, Christianity and Islam, Civilisation, Coffee, Counter-Jihad, Defend the modern world, EDL, English Defence League, Eurabia, Generation War, homosexuality, Inter-Generational relations, internet freedom, Islam and the West, Judaism, Lil Wayne, London-centric, Mark Steyn, Multiculturalism, No to Turkey in the EU, Pamela Geller, Pat Condell, politics, Rihanna, Rihanna Muslim, sex, suicide, Zionism

We are almost 12 years on from the September the 11th attacks in America, and we are at last approaching the point where we can say the right has triumphed in the debate over Islamism in Europe.

This might sound a bit too optimistic to some, but I see the evidence all around. There are no serious, mainstream conservatives or liberals still arguing for the unconditional appeasement of Islam in Europe. A huge wave of European conservative and liberal intellectuals have converted almost wholesale to neo-conservative ideas, or at least those which involve the defence of Western culture. They still don’t want to be American of course, but at last they’re realising that it wouldn’t be a ball to be Iranian, Algerian or Turkish either. The ‘either-or’ fallacy has collapsed and while America bolts leftward, Europe has never been so united in ‘right-wing’ sentiment.

If you cast your mind back just a few years ago, you can appreciate the magnitude and speed of this shift. Think back as late as 2006 when the world was first mesmerised by the oratorical skills of Barack Obama, and consider the then fashionable opinions in Europe regarding the War on Terror. It was still broadly regarded as an idiotic cowboy initiative, and the reasons for it – the threat of radical Islam – was deemed to consist mostly of hype, bloated and promoted by arms manufacturers and straw-chewing Christian fundamentalists. George W. Bush, the great dumb American caricature, was still beloved by comedians and political cartoonists in London, Paris and Berlin. You could still get a laugh by pointing to the verbal errors of the out-going President, or by linking the uneducated twang of his accent to the foreign policy he initiated. The threat of Jihad was not just a lie, but an American lie, and it was patriotic not to believe it.

And look at things now.

With veiled faces multiplying, darkening the romance of Parisian streets, Pakistani paedophiles pimping orphan girls in Oxfordshire, kebab houses degentrifying great swathes of Birmingham, and terror alerts issued in Stockholm, Belgium and Denmark – no European can any longer think it patriotic to deny that this is a problem. One could call it fashionable, one could call it bold, and provocative, but no longer is it patriotism.

The right has won the debate….but only among people of a certain generation.

For the young, the debate is ongoing, and the anti-Islamist side has its work cut out.

One of the reasons it is still a challenge is the ongoing demographic shift among European youth. Not only are Muslims growing in number and influence with each new generation, but they are managing to integrate ‘sideways’ with other immigrant communities; in particular those of Christian black Africans. Islam is becoming respected on the street even by Christians, as a natural part of third-world identity. Islam, and even Islamism, is increasingly viewed as being as much a victim of ‘the system’ (and a cool enough means of rebelling against it) as hip-hop and gangsterism.

This is a cause for concern for anyone who understands where the real cultural power lies these days.

When a Counter-Jihad activist watches a good Mark Steyn or Pamela Geller video on YouTube, they might well feel a sense of relief that the “the message is getting out there.”, and that “People are waking up…”

But such a feeling can’t survive a glance at the view count for these clips. The figures are usually at best around the 10-15,000 mark.

Even videos of the late Christopher Hitchens, one of the most popular and media-friendly intellectuals of recent memory, rarely score views over 100,000. Pat Condell, the atheist commentator maxed out on less than 4 million views with a video that was uploaded more than 3 years ago. This is nowhere near sufficient.

Notice also that the ‘video demographics’ reveal a majority of viewers to be over the age of forty.

None of that data bodes well for the future.

Elsewhere on the cultural map, if Lil Wayne or Rihanna release a new music video, views can head toward 100,000,000 within weeks.

Who’s to say that in the future, there won’t be a Rihanna in a headscarf, or a Lil Wayne with a prayer-cap? Were that to occur, the number of people educated by the Counter-Jihad community over the last ten years, would be cancelled out by the number of younger citizens gained over period of hours. And then the offices at the Daily Telegraph could go as crazy as they like; it wouldn’t matter one jot to the younger generation. They would accept a Muslim Rihanna as perfectly natural – as well as historically and culturally consistent. The third-world in the White man’s world is one-world after all – all distinctions or divisions fall away, disappear…..

And who is to blame for this?

I, as a young person, would nominate the ethno-nationalists; people who maintain that there is no qualitative difference between foreign cultures, and that all are equally undesirable. Only European, White culture is acceptable. All else is an invasion or a surrender.

We cannot win against Islamism if we surrender to this kind of catch-all racism.

We should be glad that groups like the EDL and SION have made a start at unifying world cultures in a defensive phalanx, rather than, as the BNP would do, scattering us all like birdseed to be eaten separately.

D, LDN.

Wake-Up Call for Mr London: Why the ‘Muslim Patrols’ are welcome news.

Tags

Alcohol, anti-Semitism, Christianity, Christianity and Islam, Counter-Jihad, Defend the modern world, EDL, English Defence League, Islam, Islamisation of London, Islamism, london, Muslim Patrol, Muslim Patrols, Pamela Geller, sex, Sharia

“I’m actually in favour of immigration, but not Muslim immigration. I just don’t think we have to let in people who are hostile to modernity.”

“They’re not. It’s just some who let the side down. Most of them want to escape their religion by coming here.”

This kind of dialogue should be pretty familiar to anyone residing in London, or any other great Western city. The conversation – regarding the suitability of Muslim residence in the non-Muslim world – almost always ends in a polite stalemate – neither side having budged, and with no-one having benefited.

This is understandable enough, I suppose, since the misunderstanding behind the latter statement is acute and based in a wholly alternate reality. Those who believe it almost certainly reside in areas with little or no Muslim presence. These are people – whose troop includes some of my closest friends – who believe that the Muslims walking around London they do see, draped in religious clothing and sporting veils and beards, are doing so for the same reasons as a Chelsea hipster wears an African skirt; harmless ‘identity-fashion’ in other words, or the means to make an edgy but non-political ‘cultural statement’.

Beneath that garb, they generously imagine, the Muslims are actually perfectly modern, if not slightly postmodern. They are just like you and me. All of that talk of hellfire and infidels is no more threatening or sincere than the trend for retro haircuts in Camden suggests a longing for the conservatism of the 1950s. They do it just to remember where their ancestors came from, but other than that, they couldn’t care less about who runs the country, or along which culture’s lines..

But..

Wait for it….  These people are wrong.

We in the activist community have read well enough to know this is liberal thinking at its most uninformed. Muslims do not come to London to become British any more than the English puritans sailed to America to become Cherokee. They are coming rather to ‘improve’ what they see as a decrepit and worn-out civilisation, and carry with them a solution to our moral malaise so horrible and certain-of-itself that we must either banish it wholly or submit to it in full. 

Reflecting on this earlier today, I was actually quite thrilled to read of the so-called ‘Muslim Patrols’ that are reported to be stalking East and North London. In case you haven’t read or heard about it, these are groups of Saudi-style morality-police composed mainly of unemployed volunteers, who are going around the area late-at-night snatching alcohol from passers by and shouting misogynist abuse at scantily dressed women.

It would take a quite fanatical devotee of conventional wisdom to write this off as a joke, or as some kind of post-modern performance art (though you can be sure there will be some who claim something like that).

In reality, what we have here is a community absolutely dead-set on eventual power displaying its impatience.

And don’t say it wasn’t inevitable. Everything within these people yearns for a supremacism to match their sense of superiority. Since they imagine themselves to be on the side of the Almighty, the fact that they are living in social squalor, whilst the Jews, Capitalists and homosexuals they despise live in happy plenty must be a constant headache. The need to bring a balance between what they think of themselves and the world as it actually is will compel these people to seek ever-greater influence over our lives until we do something to stop them.

Christopher Hitchens wrote that Bin Laden did the West a ‘huge favour’ on 9/11 by warning its governments and people of the building current of hatred in the Middle East. Such a warning saved the West many years of head-in-the-sand serenity before the chickens really starting coming home and made time for adequate preparation.

I would say that the ‘Sharia patrols’ currently in London are – in the same way – doing more good than bad for our chances as a civilisation. An early warning of a future unbefitting of London’s past.

D, LDN.

How come Bristol is great but Birmingham is hell?: Or why you shouldn’t blame multiculturalism for problems caused by Islam.

Tags

Birmingham, BNP, bristol, Bristolians, Christianity, Coffee, Communism, Courage, EDL, English Defence League, Eurabia, Hinduism, Islam, Islam and Multiculturalism, Islamification, london, London-centric, Manchester, Multiculturalism, Multiracialism, Park Street, politics, sex, Sikhism

I spent some of my earliest and happiest years in the English city of Bristol. It is still my favourite part of the country. I love the slope of Park street, the bistros, second-hand bookshops and coffee houses which line it and the beautiful Wills Memorial building which stands at one end and which belongs to the great University of Bristol. The shopping centre Cribs Causeway on the outskirts of town still recreates within me the childish excitement of Saturday shopping trips and the thrill of bringing back a couple of 99p CD singles to be played on repeat until bedtime. Though I now reside in London, if it were possible financially and (given my university) logistically, I would move back there in a flash and never leave. I still visit and notice the superior mood of the place. Bristol is so much happier, more civilised and coherent than London, Birmingham or Manchester. I’ve always noticed it and I think I’m starting – after all these years – to understand the reasons behind it.

I can’t list here the ways in which Bristol is superior to other British cities. I’ll just say that if you visit, you’ll find it is conspicuously more cheerful and polite than any other area of the UK. I was struck the last time I visited for example, when I bought an historical book from the main city branch of Waterstones and enjoyed – to my surprise – a few minutes of pleasant conversation about its contents (WW2) with the young staff. Perhaps one could write that off as unique to Waterstones – an upmarket, middle-class business after-all. But no, I later found the same attitude at Tesco, Waitrose, Sainsburys, Greggs, Subway, even McDonalds. People are simply more cheerful there. They speak a relaxed and charming variant of English. Racism is never openly apparent. Black-White couples are conspicuous in number in both urban and leafy areas of the city. No-one flutters an eyelid at such things. The BNP would fare terribly in this city; as would Communism or any other disruptive idea. People are generally content with their lot. Unlike in Manchester, there are few people here droning on about how London has all the wealth and landmarks. Bristol – though hardly poor – is happy enough without the Gherkin, Big Ben and Westminster Abbey. It has instead a rich sense of community. This  is not ‘community’ in the horrible sense demonstrated in places like Bradford. Bristolians are a diverse modern tribe made up of blacks, whites, Chinese, and many other groups undivided by politics, ethnicity or religion…

And so why not ask – Why isn’t this replicated in Birmingham, or London?

The ethno-nationalist would answer that Bristol, unlike Birmingham or London, has a commanding white majority, and true enough Bristol is significantly less ‘diverse’ than other large British cities – but even conceding this I could always ask the question another way –

Why isn’t Bristolian serenity replicated in Leeds, York, Newcastle or Carlisle either -cities which have an even greater white majority?

The answer here lies in the type of minorities a city has. Bristol is certainly multicultural. The city has a large community of blacks who have undeniably enriched the reputation of the city for many years,, most notably through music (Tricky, Massive Attack etc..). In terms of cultural diversity, there are Hindus, Sikhs, and Jains as well as Chinese and Japanese Buddhists who live and study alongside atheists and Methodists, Rastafarians and Scientologists, Mormons and Catholics ….You can see where I’m going with this…..

The city and greater regional area of Bristol has a tiny population of Muslims relative to Birmingham, Leeds, Manchester, London or indeed any other major metropolitan area. Those Muslims who do live in Bristol furthermore tend to be continentalised Arabs and Persians rather than the typical Pakistani or Bangladeshi variants found elsewhere in the country. This matters. Don’t doubt it. This, I believe, may be the reason for the city’s distinction.

If you’re used to Birmingham or London when you first walk along the streets of Bristol city centre late at night, you will be struck by three things: firstly, the availability of late-opening bars and places to eat: secondly, the safety of the streets and the absence of vulgar gangs and loud drunks: and thirdly you will notice the difference in the quality and character of local take-aways.

In Birmingham, the only neon that glows after the banks close emanates from newsagents and kebab shops. Chippies are rare to extinct. The smell of doner meat and curry sauce flows down the streets which, by then, are occupied by gangs of hooded chavs. Bristol could hardly differ more. The eateries here are more like those in Europe than the East-End. Inevitably a few kebab shops have invaded the area in recent years, but nowhere near as many as have in a large town like Luton, let alone a large city. Bristol at night is a gentrified, happy experience – a pleasure as sure as the city is the waking hours.

In the daytime, Bristol is perhaps distinguished most by its relaxed ‘indie’ culture. Whereas in Birmingham and Manchester and London, indie (read ‘middle-class White’) culture is moderated or banished by the more macho metal and hip-hop scenes, in Bristol it is still possible to attend school wearing a Radiohead t-shirt and not be accused of homosexuality. Even the local black music scene “trip-hop” is in many ways ‘whiter’ than the horrid ‘grime’ scenes of London and Birmingham, in that it appeals across racial lines without demanding any change in lifestyle, attitude or dress.

This general allowance for sophistication extends elsewhere. The coffee-shop is as acceptable a meeting-place as the pub. Youngsters happily infest these places, openly reading books for no other reason than pleasure.

Bristol in some ways reminds me of a state within a state; a very fragile one. Whereas most English cities seem to be going the way of Birmingham and Manchester, Bristol stands alone against this trend. It’s time for Bristolians to recognise what makes their city great and to become willing to defend and preserve it. And it’s also time for people to stop blaming multiracialism for the social problems caused by Muslims. There is a relationship between whites and those from other races in Bristol that is only made possible by the absence of Islam. Muslim communities inflame racial division; they introduce toxic international politics into otherwise serene local communities, and they de-gentrify local culture and cuisine. Bristol is a multi-coloured city, but it lacks all the hideousness of Birmingham or London and it is possible this way to understand why. It would be an awful shame were cities like Birmingham chosen to represent in ‘the parliament of public-opinion’, the whole idea of globalised modernity. Bristol shows modernity can work, and if we just develop a little more courage, it can work elsewhere too.

D. LDN.