• About (new)

Defend the Modern World

~ From Communists and Nihilists.

Defend the Modern World

Tag Archives: Murder

Retain Your Humanity.

03 Tuesday Feb 2015

Posted by Defend the Modern World in Conservatism, Crime and Punishment, Culture, Defence, Multiculturalism, Muslims, Philosophy, Politics

≈ 6 Comments

Tags

Bombs, Civilisation, Counter-Jihad, Defend the modern world, Euro, Europe, Kill all muslims?, Moral Highground, Multiculturalism, Murder, Muslims, No to Turkey in the EU, Nuke Mecca?, Race and ethnicity in the United States Census

gibran

“I agree with everything you say. Personally I’d shoot the Mudslimes on sight.”

This is line taken from an email to this author from some time ago. I made my views on it clear in my reply, but I feel moved to expound upon them here (especially since I wrote last week that I experience hate for Muslims).

I don’t advocate, have never advocated, and will never advocate genocide. Murder is murder, even when the victim is from a section of the population we dislike. I don’t believe that nuking Mecca would serve any particular purpose, nor would carpet bombing Islamic population centres.

The Muslims of Europe must be told clearly (ultimately by the state) that they are guests here, that they are making a nuisance of themselves, and that we reserve the right to revoke their citizenship and deport them if a demographic balance favouring our cultural survival cannot be otherwise maintained.

D, LDN.

Advertisement

Would You Kill for Your Freedom?

28 Monday Jul 2014

Posted by Defend the Modern World in Conservatism, Crime and Punishment, Masculinty, Muslims, Restoration of Europe

≈ 12 Comments

Tags

Afghanistan, American Liberty, Christianity and Islam, Defend the modern world, Demographics of Europe, Multiculturalism, Murder, No to Turkey in the EU, Peace, Race and ethnicity in the United States Census, Terrorism, War, Would you kill for freedom?

ddf

I met an old school friend last week, the first time I had seen or heard of him since we departed for separate colleges in 2001.

I say ‘friend’ – we were never best mates, but I remember we always sat together in French (lower set), where we often bonded through a shared antagonism towards the subject and its teacher.

We arranged via facebook to meet in a pub in Leicestershire. It was my idea. I had many questions I wanted to ask him regarding his most recent period of employment – three long tours of Afghanistan.

It’s rarely a surprise to learn which of your school-friends ended up joining the military. Timothy was no exception. He was always braver and more athletic than the rest of us. He also displayed an early appetite for danger, choosing to impress girls by jumping off high walls and sliding on frozen puddles.

Nevertheless, I wondered if the experience had changed him as a person. Had his cheeky Mancunian sense of humour been diminished or otherwise affected by the terror of combat? I also had a more specific interrogation.

After he had finished speaking (at quite some length) about an intention to move to Australia, I could restrain myself no longer.

“Was it hard in Afghanistan?” I asked, preparing the way for my real enquiry.

“Nah, it was great. Just too fucking hot. Can’t be arsed going back though.”

“Were you frontline or..”

“Infantry.”

Oh, the hell with it, I thought.

“Did you kill anyone?”

A long pause followed.

He replied positively. It shocked me more than it had any right to.

My friend – the little boy who had tripped me in football practice, stole my pencil sharpener, accompanied me on afterschool detentions – had shot terrorists. The thought held me in cold hypnosis for the rest of our time together.

Murder is obviously a complicated moral issue; arguably the most complicated. The taking away of life from another person – especially for ideological reasons – pushes the human mind into direct confrontation with the fundamentals of existence. What is this conscious experience between birth and demise, what is the value of it, and have I got a better right to mine than another man has to his?

It was perhaps as recent as the 1960s that opposition to murder (for any reason) was standardised and made doctrinal. For the previous two millennia, occasional exceptions to the 6th commandment were reasoned as necessary for national, cultural and (in some cases) personal survival. The decade of love rebranded ‘peace’ as a choice. It was no longer a luxurious state of security paid for with dead soldiers, but a primordial global condition, achievable by goodwill and blotting paper.

Since then, this absurd way of thinking has become so entrenched that even advocacy of WWII is now considered controversial and the image of dead Nazis something to philosophise about, rather than gloat over. Those of us who resist the trend meanwhile are deemed morally suspect if not nakedly evil.

It will therefore be considered foul and unkind for me to admit that I enjoy hearing about a herd of Islamists being torn apart by RAF missiles; that I relish the idea of Waffen SS troops being beaten and starved by post-war Allied occupation forces; that I smile when I read of a rogue Ghurkha beheading a captured Taliban parasite.

And perhaps even that I feel immensely proud of you, Tim. I really do. Your work has done more for the world than you might yet appreciate. Forget the pencil sharpener.

D, LDN.

Charlene Downes.

12 Tuesday Nov 2013

Posted by Defend the Modern World in Conservatism, Crime and Punishment, Culture, Multiculturalism, Muslims, Politics

≈ 3 Comments

Tags

Albattikhi, Blackpool, British National Party, Charlene, Christianity and Islam, Counter-Jihad, Counterjihad, Cultural Marxism, Defend the modern world, Downes, England, Eurabia, Islamisation of London, Lancashire, Multiculturalism, Murder, Muslims, Race and ethnicity in the United States Census

100197561_Downes_470466c

If you’re not from the United Kingdom, you may never have heard the name ‘Charlene Downes’ before. In England however, her name is known by anyone with an internet connection.

I say ‘internet connection’ advisedly, as the Downes case has been scarcely reported in the mainstream media, and for reasons both contemptible and (sadly) familiar. Her disappearance and ‘alleged’ murder by ‘allegedly’ Muslim groomers in the seaside town of Blackpool in 2003, has since become a rallying point for ‘Islamophobes’ (and ethno-nationalists) across the North of England. The flatlining British National Party have for years featured the Downes case on their website, and have established links with Charlene’s parents. Demonstrations (led by the BNP) have also been held to criticize the police investigation into the case, the mistakes of which have allowed Ms Downes’ killer(s) to remain free.

You might well ask, ‘Why this particular case?”. There are many thousands of Muslim grooming victims in the UK, each case equally horrific. Why does Charlene’s tragedy seem to allow for a special  and lasting vitriol?

To understand this, we must describe exactly what is alleged to have happened.

On Saturday, November the 1st, 2003, Ms Downes departed from her mother near the centre of Blackpool, Lancashire. She was apparently going to meet friends in the amusement arcades. Since that departure, only one or two sightings are reported, and Downes would never be seen again (…at least by her family.)

At the trial of a gang of Muslims in 2007, it was alleged that Ms Downes (14 years old) had been the victim of paedophilic ‘grooming’  for many weeks prior to her disappearance, and that (allegedly) on this occasion the gang responsible had decided to murder her and subsequently dispose of the body.

It is the manner in which the gang are said to have disposed of Ms Downes’ which explains the case’s lasting and sinister notoriety.

Covering the trial in 2007, the Telegraph reported that ‘

‘A witness had heard Albattikhi ( the ringleader) and others talking about Charlene in an alleyway.

“These people were talking about sex with white girls, and there was mention of having sex with Charlene,” he said.

“Albattikhi laughed and said she was very small – the plainest possible indication that he was lying to the police when he said he did not know her. He and others present then laughingly said that Charlene had gone into the kebabs.”

Since no trace of Ms Downes has ever been found, and since Mr Albattikhi ran a fast-food shop, there is every reason not to write this off as a joke. Indeed, it was treated seriously in court, and remains a revolting and yet sadly feasible theory as to Ms Downes’ fate.

Despite the evidence presented, the case was eventually thrown out of court and Charlene’s killers remain at large. The verdict hasn’t changed many peoples minds as to who carried out the killing.

As I said above, the Downes’ case has since been claimed (as a cause) by the ethno-nationalist right. The Counter-Jihad movement should never have allowed this to happen. The BNP association has arguably endangered the case and hindered the pursuit of justice. Since we are now close to the 10 year anniversary of Ms Downes’ disappearance, and given the undeniably gruesome notoriety the case has assumed, perhaps it’s time the movement itself did more to re-contextualize the case and remind people of the larger issue at hand.

More information on this tragic case can be found at the following links:


http://muslimrapewave.wordpress.com/justice-for-charlene-downes-paige-chivers/
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1374443/Police-hid-abuse-60-girls-Asian-takeaway-workers-linked-Charlene-Downes-murder.html

D, LDN

Categories

  • Abortion
  • Africa
  • America
  • Anti-Feminism
  • Anti-Modernism
  • Antisemitism
  • Asia
  • Atheism
  • Australia
  • Balance of Global Power
  • Barack Obama
  • Canada
  • China
  • Christianity
  • Class
  • Communism
  • Conservatism
  • Crime and Punishment
  • Culture
  • Decline of the West
  • Defence
  • Donald Trump
  • Dysgenics
  • Economics
  • EDL
  • End of American Power
  • Eurabia
  • Europe
  • European Union
  • Feminism
  • Germany
  • Heroism
  • History
  • Imperialism
  • India
  • ISIS
  • Islam
  • Islamisation of the West
  • Israel
  • Japan
  • Literature
  • Masculinty
  • Moderate Muslims
  • Multiculturalism
  • Muslim Rape
  • Muslims
  • Philosophy
  • Politics
  • Psychology
  • Race and Intelligence
  • Racism
  • Religion
  • Restoration of Europe
  • Russia
  • Saudi Arabia
  • Scandinavia
  • Scotland
  • Sexual Violence
  • Terrorism
  • UKIP
  • Uncategorized
  • Violence
  • White People
  • Zionism

Archives

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Blog at WordPress.com.

Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
  • Follow Following
    • Defend the Modern World
    • Join 366 other followers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • Defend the Modern World
    • Customize
    • Follow Following
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...