Normalising Muslim Britain

Tags

BBC, Blog, Britain First, Christianity and Islam, Civilisation, Counter-Jihad, Counterjihad, Defend the modern world, EastEnders, Facebook, Islam, Islam and the West, Islamification of Britain, Islamisation of London, moderate, Moderate Muslims, Multiculturalism, No to Turkey in the EU, Race and ethnicity in the United States Census, trum, trump, Twitter, wordpress

• First published on this blog in January, 2016

The presence of Islam in 21st century Britain is no more natural or inevitable than the presence of Sikhism in Chile. It’s worth repeating this fact whenever possible or appropriate. This is because many fake liberals continue to push the argument that Islamophobes such as you or I are somehow unworldly, retrograde, or unrealistic for opposing Muslim settlement in the contemporary West.

Some commentators go even further, saying that far from being a new and foreign element in our society, Islam is a traditional part of Europe, citing irrelevant factors like the antique conurbations of Muslim Sicily, Malta or Andalucía. Islamic influence, they claim, can be found in Europe’s system of law, code of social ethics, philosophy, medicine, architecture and geography. Given that this is so, why shouldn’t Muslim Pakistanis, Turks or Arabs live in present-day Leeds or Stockholm? They are as responsible for the greatness of these places as the natives…right?

No. Not right at all. It is certainly true that Islam’s Andalusian Golden age imparted a great number of ideas to European elites, many of which are now claimed as entirely and originally European. However, such contributions were mostly limited to disciplines of what we would now call ‘academia’ and in-any-case are dwarfed many times over by the influence of European ideas on Muslim civilisation. Do Europeans have the moral right to settle in Muslim countries on that basis? No, of course they don’t. And vice versa.

Leftists like to push the myth of European-Islamic co-development for one reason above all; they think it will normalise the presence of Islam in Europe and erase the memory of a Europe without Islam. For if the Muslim presence in Europe can be made to seem normal, traditional or ancient, objections to it will naturally seem irrational, unreasonable and unrealistic.

Another way the same effect can be achieved is via the media, and especially the screen media. Over Christmas, like most Britons, I found myself slouched in front of the television for extended periods of time. During that time I witnessed an astonishing barrage of British Islamic subject matter. There was the Citizen Khan Christmas special on BBC One (Note: CK is a woefully unfunny Muslim sitcom). There were the quiz shows with a disproportionate number of Muslim contestants, many of whom wore Hijabs or prayer caps. There was Eastenders – perhaps the most popular show in Britain today – with gripping plotlines involving characters called Shabnam, Kush, Tamwar, Masood, Fatima, Kamil and Ali. National (and even more so) local newsreaders and weathermen/girls were disproportionately Muslim. And so on. Over time, this normalises something abnormal; the slow bleed of east into west; the merging of two contraries into a single untenable consensus.

This is new. This is unnatural. And this is not something we should be tolerating.

D, LDN

Advertisements

Can We Please Stop Pretending the ‘East-End’ Still Exists?

Tags

Christianity and Islam, Cockney, Coffee, Coronation Street, Counter-Jihad, Counterjihad, Cultural Marxism, Defend the modern world, Demographics of Europe, East End of London, East-End, EastEnders, England, Jellied eels, london, Multiculturalism, Muslims, No to Turkey in the EU, politics, Race and ethnicity in the United States Census, Rihanna Muslim, Tower Hamlets

On the 10th of November, a story in the Daily Mail carried the following headline: “They’re not just for cockneys! Sales of jellied EELS booming outside London for the first time as shoppers cut costs.”

(For those outside the UK, jellied eels are an antiquated snack-food associated with Victorian Cockney (East-End working class) society.)

The article (or rather the headline), despite being intended as light-hearted nonsense, provoked quite a few politicized responses. One such reply read

“London? Cockneys? When was the last time you walked down an East-End street?”

 While another suggested simply:

“Probably because there are no Cockneys left inside the M25.”

These objections are well-founded. Indeed, the very notion of a geo-cultural ‘East-End’ filled with ‘Cockneys’ is even more out-of-date than the stereotype understands.

The “East-End” of London, described on Wikipedia (no less) as ‘coterminous with the borough of Tower Hamlets’, is now almost without trace of its historic identity. If you got off at an East-Central Tube station tommorow, you’d find yourself in a maze of Bangladeshi restaurants, bazaars, curry houses and religious buildings. One thing you wouldn’t see, or at least would be hard-pressed to find, was any living hint of England.

None of this is controversial. All of it was predicted by (and is now indicated in) the official statistics.

Yet still, in the media – no doubt for the benefit of those who rarely visit London – the ‘East-End’ is presented as being frozen in time; a traditional, pub-centred timewarp inhabited by a largely White Working-Class demographic.

Nowhere is this deceit more obvious than in the popular soap opera ‘EastEnders’. For a long while this show has been the second most popular drama in the UK, behind Coronation Street. Despite this popularity and the public trust the BBC is meant to honour, the show brazenly uses for its casting, a demographic model suited to the London of thirty years ago. Eight out of ten characters are non-Asian. Most are White, nominally Christian, family-centred and employed. If this were a real and representative slice of the contemporary East-End, the minority fifth would be the English, and the majority would be benefit-claiming Muslims.

The audience outside of London, if they haven’t bothered to find out otherwise, might reasonably infer from the ‘Walford’ universe that the Islamisation of the East-End never happened.

And why on Earth would the BBC want to give that impression?

D, LDN.