The Fraud: Anjem Choudary’s Quest for Notoriety

Tags

America, America 911, anjem, Anjem Choudary, anjem choudary arrest, anjem choudary bbc, anjem choudary fox news, anjem choudary muslim, anjem choudary newsnight, BBC, Civilisation, Counter-Jihad, Counterjihad, Defend the modern world, deport anjem, Facebook, Muslims, No to Turkey in the EU, Political Correctness, Race and ethnicity in the United States Census, Terror, tiwtter

From relatively modest beginnings, ‘English’ hate-preacher Anjem Choudary has risen through the ranks of evil to become the star of the British tabloid press. After the hook-handed, one-eyed nightmare Abu Hamza was carted off to America to face overdue terror charges, and the equally horrific cleric Abu Qatada was deported to Jordan for similar offences, the red-top media has had to rely almost entirely on Choudary to provide their readers’ daily fill of anger and indignation.

If you sense a cynical tone in my words, you are right on the nail. The transformation of radical Islam into a pantomime, complete with quasi-humorous oddball villains is a very dangerous and inappropriate game in my view. No issue is more serious or more threatening to our country than Islam, and the reality is far darker than low-risk, smooth-talking pieces of shit like Choudary would suggest.

Serious (active) Jihadis don’t appear in documentaries, and nor do they jostle for supremacy with Sean Hannity and Pamela Geller in Fox News debate shows. They keep their rotten little heads down and plot the murder of women and children – that’s what they do. The people waving placards suggesting the murder of the Pope are usually cowards who do not have the courage of their own hideous convictions. Anjem Choudary fits that definition perfectly.

Choudary is certainly an Islamist (and an enemy of the West), but unlike some of his peers, he is a fundamentally spineless. He has never directly taken part in terrorist attacks (which, though nefarious, must involve a willingness to tolerate pain and the loss of liberty). Despite suggesting that others do so, he has refused to join his brothers in the ranks of ISIS, a refusal that makes no sense if one believes his claim to agree with their agenda. For all his hostility towards the British state, he continues to live off the British taxpayer, receiving thousands upon thousands in benefits every year. And according to certain reports (most of which he has denied), he cannot even resist the pleasures of secularism, like alcohol and casual sex with native women.

Choudary is a gigantic fraud and a gutless nobody. He doesn’t incite outrage to promote or protect Islam, but solely because he enjoys the limelight. Like a twisted Islamic Katie Hopkins, Choudary thrives on column inches and airtime, regarding himself as heroically honest, brutally articulate and historically essential.

Even Muslims are beginning to see through the act. I have read numerous accusations on social media alleging that Choudary is a state agent, hired by MI5 to whip up hostility against the Religion of Peace. He isn’t, of course. But the fact such accusations can be brought to mind is further evidence of his ideological amateurishness.

As you’ll be aware, Mr Choudary was arrested this past week on charges of encouraging support for Islamic State. While this is good news, I doubt it will lead to a satisfactory conclusion of the Choudary saga. The only fitting end would be the exile of this fake, freedom-loving con-artist to the cultural and economic wilderness he pretends to prefer.

D, LDN.

Advertisement

“If you don’t like it here….?”

Tags

Anjem Choudary, Christianity and Islam, Counter-Jihad, Defend the modern world, Demographics of Europe, Deport Muslims, English Defence League, Islam, Multiculturalism, racism, Western world

“If you don’t like it here, then why don’t you f**k off back to where you came from!”

It’s a taunt as old as multicultural society itself, but this – the oldest and most basic expression of xenophobic discomfort is still one of the most effective available.

There was a time when this phrase was directed against all kinds of people with immigrant-origins – from African pensioners to Asian shopkeepers to Mixed-race schoolchildren. Nowadays (thankfully) it seems reserved exclusively for use against the Muslim population of the Anglophone West.

I’m not sure precisely how we ought to deal with this, morally-speaking; a phenomenon that began as lazy and randomly (mis)directed, and yet which now seems so neat and reasonable. I suppose it depends on whether something originally racist can become non-racist in a different context.

Racial hatred, at least of an explicit kind, has long gone out of fashion in the Western world and few openly espouse it. Consequently, when someone uses a phrase like the above, it sounds like a reversion to something every immigrant knows they no longer have to put up with.

This is understandable, but a shame nonetheless. As phrases go, this one is actually quite helpful, especially in todays context of Islamisation.

When applied against Muslims, this taunt manages to get to the heart of Islamist hypocrisy but at the same time bypass any reference to their race and/or appearance. It’s worth repeating to consider again….

“If you don’t like it here, then why don’t you fuck off back to where you came from!”

The first part of this insult (if it is one) presupposes that the Muslim in question has made a complaint about Western society, and has suggested that his (Islamic) way of living would make a superior replacement. This is becoming ever more regular, and will only carry on increasing alongside the numbers of the Muslim population itself. I no longer feel any surprise when I am told by Muslim proselytizers that Britain (and the West) is a moral sewer and that “Islam is the answer”.

The second part, “Why don’t you fuck off back to where you came from!”, should be properly understood as a question, even if it was meant originally to be rhetorical. It is one worth asking repeatedly…..

Why don’t Muslims, who say they dislike the licentiousness of Western life, move to a state run along Islamic lines?

Evasive answers to this – for example, “I was born here” should be discounted. Being born somewhere is not a tether which cannot be cut. I too was born here, but I often consider moving.

The real answer, and the one Muslims will never provide, is that they know (deep-down) that Western society is superior to the societies of their ethnic homelands; that the West is richer and happier, as well as more advanced and free and allowing of difference than Pakistan or Qatar.

They don’t leave because they don’t want to leave.

There is a yawning disconnect here, between what Muslims are told by religious elders to believe, and what their life-experience has shown them. When the tension between these two realities becomes unbearable, then the Western Muslim usually does one of two things – he either becomes an extremist, or (more rarely) he leaves Islam. Both occasions present ways of getting rid of the Muslim in question, either by replacing him with a prison-number, or else with a newly formed Christian/atheist.

Consequently, the harvest of “If you don’t like it here…” usually rewards the labour (and risk) of planting it.

D, LDN.