Tags
American Liberty, anti-Semitism, Barack Obama, BBC, Britain First, Civilisation, Counter-Jihad, Counterjihad, Dear Muslims, Defend the modern world, EU, European Union, Islam, Islam in Europe, Islam in Europe and America, Islam versus the West, Israel, Multiculturalism, Muslims, Muslims in Europe, No to Turkey in the EU, Race and ethnicity in the United States Census
*Originally published on this blog in July, 2015
If you (reader) are one of the twenty million devout Muslims currently resident in Europe, I’d like to try explain to you why I believe your beliefs are incompatible with the culture of your adopted home. But more than this, I hope also to persuade you that this view (shared by a growing majority of Europeans) does not emanate from ignorance or racism, and why it may not be a defeat or a humiliation for you to agree with it.
You or your parents probably came to Europe initially for economic reasons, seeking a better life and a more secure future. There is nothing dishonourable or unusual about that. Most non-Muslim migrants make the journey with the same ambitions. The West is very wealthy and safe relative to the rest of the world and so it is only rational to want to join it.
Once here, you or your parents probably planned to exist in a peaceful but separate state to the majority, maintaining your beliefs and traditions quietly in the same way that Orthodox Jews and Eastern Orthodox migrants have done in the past. Increasingly, this doesn’t seem to be possible, if it ever was. And in my view, the reasons for that directly relate to the nature of Islamic belief and the sense of mission that is so inseparable from it.
Unlike Christianity or Judaism, yours is a conquering faith, not a persuading one. Relatively little importance is given to peaceful proselytization in Islam. While there are occasionally stalls set out in front of tube stations or elsewhere in city centres to preach Islamic doctrine, this is an imitation of Christian practice and not something organically ‘Muslim’. Rather, Muslims have historically sought to attain dominion over society by violence, sometimes later permitting religious diversity within that society, but never allowing any symbol to enjoy precedence over the crescent. Their hope, indeed their announced intention, has always been to exalt Islam to a position of cultural dominance and authority. While Christians and Jews have peacefully resided as minorities in many different parts of the world, Muslims have always struggled with the very concept of minority life. Since Allah is supposed to be the only authority to which submission is made, it is seen by most Muslims (and perhaps by you specifically) to be incongruous that a divine authority is subordinate to any non-Islamic regime, whether secular or religious. Minarets are built to tower above all other buildings for grander reasons than amplification. They proclaim symbolically the primacy and authority of Islam over the territory Muslims inhabit. It will simply not do that cathedrals or government buildings are larger or invested with more power and importance. Indeed, it is blasphemous and idolatrous. As Islamists never forget to proclaim before they demolish some priceless artefact – “Nothing and no-one is worthy of veneration except Allah”.
This sense of mission, inherent within Islamic theory, has radically altered human history. The nations of Lebanon, Libya and Syria were once Christian. The territory of what is now Pakistan and Afghanistan was once Buddhist. Persia was once Zoroastrian. That these places are now Muslim is testament to Islam’s conquering urge and military spirit. Islam seeks not only to convert, but to dominate and subdue. It is expansionist by its very nature. It was not designed to be one faith out of many, but to be the one and only faith of all humankind. The Quran itself is not shy of stating this. I would quote the passages urging the subjugation of unbelievers here but this would be so long as to be disruptive to my argument.
Your faith is antagonistic to everything but itself. And since you began settling in Europe back in the 1960s, members of your community have behaved in a way harmonious with that analysis. Just recently in Britain, there has been a wave of serious sexual assault committed by Muslims against exclusively non-Muslim children. Some estimates put the number of girls assaulted by British Pakistanis as high as 200,000. In the town of Rotherham alone, at least 1400 girls are known to have been forced into sexual slavery by Muslim gangs.
And even when it doesn’t lead to assault, your behaviour around women (if you are a man) is infantile and tactless. It would appear customary that upon meeting a woman (Muslim or otherwise, online or in real life) your first words either involve sex or invite a personal relationship that can lead to sex. It might surprise you – it probably has surprised you – but non-Muslim women do not enjoy being asked for their phone number or address by a complete stranger without any preceding conversation. Your lack of charm – indeed, your failure to even understand the idea and purpose of charm – is absolute. To you, women are merely sexual animals, possessing no greater value or agency than cats and dogs. For this reason, perhaps more than any other, I find it difficult to breathe the same air as you.
Then there are the acts of extreme violence. Members of your community blew up the train network in Madrid, Spain and the subway in London, England. Members of your community massacred the staff of a cartoon tabloid in Paris. Members of your community have beheaded European citizens, the most recent case occurring only a month ago. You even hunt your own kind! Hundreds of Muslim women have now been killed in Europe in the name of ‘honour’ – and usually by members of their own family. Every year, thousands of Muslim girls are taken abroad to have their vagina mutilated by a shaving razor and then brought back to lead a miserable, painful existence with the perpetrators.
How could we possibly put up with this? What kind of people would we be if we did?
Face the facts, a growing proportion of the native population of Europe actively despises you, and does so without allowing any distinction for your race, Islamic school or individual contribution to European society. After decades of aggressive dysfunction and sickening crime, people simply hate you. They hate you and they fear you. And it is becoming difficult for even the most committed liberal to propose a reason why they shouldn’t.
There is an obvious – some would say cartoonish – contrast between the Islamic conception of society and the hopes and opinions of the Europeans. We value things you view as Satanic. You value things we regard as barbaric. You put faith before reason. We put reason before faith. You regard women as second-class human beings. We regard the sexes as equal. You view freedom of speech as being limited to secular matters. We believe it should permeate every corner of life and thought.
Even if this weren’t the case, your religious tradition is not the one that we are used to and which has inspired and characterised our manners and rituals over centuries. No European books are dedicated to your God. No statues of your Prophet (even if this were allowed) grace the Piazzas of our cities. Few if any Qur’anic phrases have entered our common parlance. We don’t celebrate your holy days, and have no regard for your heroes and saints.
You might reply that Hindu and Sikh mythologies do not inform our ways either, but then Hindus and Sikhs have proven themselves to be comfortable with that. I have never heard of an act of Hindu terrorism, nor any religiously-motivated outrage committed by a Sikh, Buddhist, Scientologist or Jain organisation. Islam has actively distinguished itself in violence, in readiness to fight and to make war where there is peace.
You are wrong if you take us for fools. We know well enough what the phrases Dar al-Harb and Dar al-Islam mean. We recognise the desire on your part to transfer us from one to the other and by what means. You must have known from the start that a project of this historical magnitude would be resisted with passion and fire. And, please believe me, that passion and fire is already generated in sufficient quantity should we ever be given the excuse to unleash it.
There are people on this (uniquely civilised) continent who would gladly slaughter you like dogs. It is not fantastical anymore to foresee a new Nazi movement emerging in Europe and going on to behave in a Hitlerian fashion. Nobody (save a few lunatics) wishes to go back there. Peace in Europe has been a blessing. Democracy is deserving of all the celebration dedicated to it. But your behaviour is testing the hold of democracy to its white-knuckled limits.
How then can we defuse this bomb? How might we organise a solution that forbids the need for mass violence and the self-destruction of democratic liberalism? This of course is the great question of my generation, and the most important task of the Western World, ahead of the environment, Russia, or any other exaggerated diversion.
That there is – or rather, that you are – an issue in need of resolution can no longer be sensibly denied. We are obliged by everything we hold dear to guarantee that the Islamisation of Europe ceases and that what progress it has already made is reversed. The Western way of life is not just ‘different’ to your own, but a million times superior. We are behaving very rationally by seeking to protect it.
Incidentally, you can deny this last fact as much as you want. It makes no difference to me. Deep down, beneath all the evasions and the layers of self-hypnosis, I’m sure you accept it as much as I do. If you didn’t, you wouldn’t still be here.
And that is the real, embarrassing truth, no? Whatever your friends have scrawled on placards in the past, you don’t ‘hate our way of life’ at all. You are simply jealous of it, and angry that your ancestral lands have failed – and are still failing – to develop in a like fashion.
For an effective and rapid solution to this problem, I propose the following measures – If you are brave, honest and intelligent enough to rid your mind of the numbing circularities of Islamic thinking, a space in the European future can and should be found for you. If not, and if you continue to display the toxic side effects of Islamic belief, then no more kid glove treatment should be forthcoming. If you espouse anti-Semitic, anti-Democratic and anti-Western ideas, you should be arrested and receive criminal records, with all the implications that has for finding employment, pursuing political office and securing tenancy and accommodation. The wearing of the Niqab must be outlawed and repeat offenders deported to a country where it is still the prevailing fashion. All Muslims involved in the mass-rape of British children must hang. Any Mosque preaching violence against Jews, Christians or Homosexuals must be shut down and demolished, and the same with colleges and Islamic faith schools. There must be an end to all immigration from Muslim countries, including from those cultures touted as exceptional (like Tunisia, Turkey or Iran). The culture of the West must be openly celebrated as the supreme culture of the world, and no ‘noble’ savagery must ever be taught as a desirable alternative to our children.
Our foreign policy must also be redesigned to reflect our desire to survive. Turkey should be expelled from NATO and replaced by Armenia. Any sanctions lifted from Iran must be reimposed. Investment in alternatives to Middle Eastern oil, including fracking (in lightly populated areas), fusion technology, nuclear and renewable energy must be radically increased. Western arms should only be exported to regimes which ruthlessly suppress Islamist activity (like Egypt and Jordan) and never to theocratic countries, whether ‘allies’ or not (Saudi, UAE, Kuwait etc…). Needless to say, our support for Israel must be great and unconditional.
In all these efforts, our motivating principle (and final goal) must be that Islam is forever segregated from the Western World.
Finally, reader, I promised at the beginning to tell you why it isn’t a humiliation for you to agree with my arguments… This is for the simple reason that you were a human being long before you were a Muslim, and this will always be the most salient fact about you. You are no more biologically predestined to ignorance and poverty than a Swede or a German. If you wish to become free, you can become free! And if you prefer slavery, well, then there is no defeat in relocating to pursue it, if that is your dream. There can no ‘shame’ in wanting to be where you belong. Nothing is more human.
Whichever condition you choose (and we will make you choose), understand that the West is the homeland of the free, the creative and the happy. A slave will always be foreign here.
D, LDN.
Excellent piece. I am printing this off and leaving it as reading material Hansel and Gretel style on my travels.
Regards.
LikeLike
Thank you. Glad you liked it.
LikeLike
I’d appreciate readers sharing this article on other websites. I don’t believe many Muslims are fans of this site. I would like some of them to read it.
LikeLike
Outstanding, bravo!
Things are coming to a boil I think. Things are coming to a head.
Cameron is making a speech tomorrow on the need for Islamist ideology to be taken on and confronted. Its a start. There will be wailing from the Muslims and Sharia-Marxists but the pressure is here.
See these tweets with some poll data
Politicians cannot ignore this any more. t is the subterranean conversation of our time, especially as Islam shoves itself in our faces more and more. Something has to be done, to confront the Islamist menace. If for no other reason to head off the nasty backlash that is building up because of the jihadi-hate culture within Islam in Britain
LikeLiked by 1 person
Politicians will find a way of ignoring the problem for many years to come. The only thing that can change this is the election of more radical politicians.
LikeLike
Although it is encouraging that Mr Cameron feels comfortable in speaking about the problem so directly.
LikeLike
Add my kudos on the letter.
And a reminder to Mahometans that Allah comes before Mohammad and this was not entirely lost on all believers… perhaps.
Bani Adam
By Persian Poet Saadi (Abū-Muhammad Muslih al-Dīn bin Abdallāh Shīrāzī, Saadi Shiraz – 1184 – 1283/1291)
Bani Adam
as translated by M. Aryanpoor:
Human beings are members of a whole,
In creation of one essence and soul.
If one member is afflicted with pain,
Other members uneasy will remain.
If you’ve no sympathy for human pain,
The name of human you cannot retain!
As translated by H. Vahid Dastjerdi:
Adam’s sons are body limbs, to say;
For they’re created of the same clay.
Should one organ be troubled by pain,
Others would suffer severe strain.
Thou, careless of people’s suffering,
Deserve not the name, “human being”.
As translated by Dr. Iraj Bashiri:
Of One Essence is the Human Race,
Thusly has Creation put the Base.
One Limb impacted is sufficient,
For all Others to feel the Mace.
The Unconcern’d with Others’ Plight,
Are but Brutes with Human Face.
The translations above are attempts to preserve the rhyme scheme of the original while translating into English, but may distort the meaning. What follows is an attempt at a more literal translation of the original Persian:
“Human beings (children of Adam) are the parts of a body,
They are from the same species,
When one of these parties is reached and suffering,
Others can not find neither peace nor tranquility,
If the misery of others leaves you indifferent,
And without any trouble! Then:
It is unthinkable to call yourself a human being.”
Goethe and Pushkin new of Saadi’s works. Obama quoted the first two lines of Bani Adam in a video greeting to the people of Iran. It seems however, official Islam (Persian iteration) is enamored more of the spirit Saadi’s fame than the spirit of his poems.
Still. I am left to wonder, under the tenets of Islamic canons, are ‘human beings’ judged so by their fidelity to Allah and the Prophet – all others being… less than human? My doubt is not of my own manufacture. Islam had put it there.
LikeLike
“…under the tenets of Islamic canons, are ‘human beings’ judged so by their fidelity to Allah and the Prophet – all others being… less than human?” – The answer is certainly ‘yes’. Unbelievers are barely human in the Muslim imagination.
LikeLike
Articulately put. Considering the problems the west has always had with Muslim world it’s surprising, is it not, that we encouraged mass immigration from Muslim countries in the first place (just let them all in). In terms of a ‘fight back’ – most young people, at least the ones I’ve met, still subscribe to the view that it’s the media which demonises islam and that it really is ‘the religion of peace’ – which obviously isn’t true. Another point: I don’t believe the west is sufficiently able or even disposed to fight Islam – we have no self belief or will for a fight – decades or state imposed multiculturalism, colonial guilt etc has seen to that.
LikeLike
That’s beginning to change, I think. I was made into an Islamophobe at university and I think a lot of my peers there were taught the same lesson. The young people who believe Islam isn’t a threat are usually those with no direct experience of Muslim behaviour.
LikeLike
Magnificent!!! Normally I would make various comments concerning such a lengthy post, but on this one all that I really need to say is…I UTTERLY AND TOTALLY AGREE WITH WHAT YOU HAVE WRITTEN!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you. I’m glad you like it.
LikeLike
The problem is, this Cameron speech is riddled with doublethink and hypocrisy. He isn’t just proposing to tackle Islamic extremism, but “extremism in all its forms” and “both violent and non-violent”. This is an attack on freedom of speech, the very “British” value that he is promising to defend. The plan that is behind this is that if we shut all the Islamic and anti Islamic voices (such as this blog) up, then we can all live happily together in a lovely multi-culti way, celebrating Ramadan and ignoring the fact that we are the “vilest of animals” according to the lovely Koran. If you don’t believe me, read this 2014 conference speech by Theresa May, who is the architect of this Orwellian plan:
http://press.conservatives.com/post/98799073410/theresa-may-speech-to-conservative-party
Do you really think that allowing our home secretary to unilaterally gag anyone at all, with the threat of imprisonment, for non-violent speech is a good idea? These same politicians rush to press conferences to announce that “these violent acts have nothing to do with Islam” after every Islam inspired atrocity. They may very well decide to gag anyone who contradicts that point of view. At least it looks as if this legislation is being delayed until after the summer recess. We still live in a democracy, for now.
We already have a perfectly adequate law against incitements to violence, the problem is that religions that call for all the disbelievers to be wiped out are exempted.
LikeLike
Muslims should be treated as an exception. There is always a risk that laws can be used for purposes other than those they were designed for. In the case of Islam, I now believe we must start taking risks.
LikeLike
Sorry that was supposed to be a response to Billy Qasira’s comment, not to the article. Cameron’s speech did seem to show some hardening of attitudes:
“But simply denying any connection between the religion of Islam and the extremists doesn’t work, because these extremists are self-identifying as Muslims.”
This does sound like a change in tone, but unfortunately then he said next:
“The fact is from Woolwich to Tunisia, from Ottawa to Bali, these murderers all spout the same twisted narrative, one that claims to be based on a particular faith.”
so he sort of wriggled back to the nothing to do with Islam line. He also mentioned “sickening Islamophobia”. The problem remains that although he seemed more focused on Islamic extremism, its still clearly not the only type of “extremism” he has in mind. So, everything promised previously by Ms May is still on the agenda. Anyway seems this legislation is not coming until the autumn now.
LikeLike
Another start is the de-legitimization of islam as a religion. It is an all encompassing ideology whose only mission is world domination. Religion? Hardly. More like fascism, nazi-ism and the like, both well used and worn comparisons. The extra ingredient in islam that distinguishes it from these other “isms” is its subversion of the status quo by a phony “assimilation” and clamour for special rights pitiably playing the god game. All the outward expressions of devoutness are just a dog and pony show to keep other muslims in line. Every muslim alive knows this. ALL is in service of allah, not humanity. Seems to me that allah hates humanity judging from the work of his minions. Their purpose in life is to bring death to the “other”, i.e. you and I unless we conform to the sharia. This should be explicitly and constantly re-iterated in the West in our media, our educational institutions and EVERYWHERE. It is simply the truth no matter what bleating “progressive” (oh, how I hate that word) says. When a muslim says they love death, believe them. Is this compatible with Western Humanism and democracy? I don’t think so. Bravo for such a well written and clear eyed assessment of our current “problem with islam”. Islam IS the problem.
LikeLike
I agree. It’s especially important in educational institutions. I dread to think what my nephew and niece are going to be taught about Islam when they are older. No doubt they’ll hear that it’s a naturally peaceful faith with purely political (short-term) problems.
LikeLike
If more people would read Milestones by Sayyid Qutb, society might stand a chance of understanding the threat. Islam is meant to be the destiny of humanity. Those who worship any other way are considered ignorant or stubborn. They won’t rest until we are all on our knees.
LikeLike
Bravo, mate. Bravo. Well said. BTW – here is another article which makes a nice companion piece to yours – “Millions and Millions of Mohammeds”. Another one to set circulating far and wide on social media, and to print off on paper and scatter, Johnny-Appleseed style, accidentally-on-purpose, in waiting rooms and cafes and inside the left-behind newspaper on public transport.
http://sultanknish.blogspot.com.au/2015/07/millions-and-millions-of-mohammeds.html
I think you and Daniel Greenfield are “brothers-in-arms”.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I love Daniel Greenfield’s work.
LikeLike
A superb piece, David. Sorry for not getting back sooner, but various commitments have prevented me from having the time.
Yes, it is very difficult trying to say and do the ‘right thing’ when teaching Islam, but I’m very good at the old subliminal messages with those I teach. The intelligent ones certainly get my views!
On a separate note, what do you think of Britain First?
All the best
Art
Sent from my iPad
>
LikeLike
Hi Ken,
Thank you for the kind words.
I don’t agree with everything Britain First does or says, as they are very active and vocal on just about everything. On the isolated issue of Islam though, they are doing a lot of good. The number of followers they attract is pretty astonishing. It can only be a good thing that people are hearing an alternative commentary to the one supplied by the BBC/ITV/C4 gang.
LikeLike
Hum…Now that’s one thing to write it, but I’d be curious to know how various muslims would react if actually confronted to someone reading this to them.
LikeLike
I’m interested also. I hope some Muslims have read this.
LikeLike
We will have to talk to them about the future at some point. No solution can be pursued without dialogue.
LikeLike
In the interests of full disclosure I am a non European Muslim.
“None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe that they are free”
You are clueless. You have little understanding of history. You typify what in my opinion is the average Westerner.
Islam in the vast majority of cases did not spread by force conversions and those cases that were forced were against Islamic injunctions. So Afghanistan and Pakistan used to be Buddhist, Western Europe used to be pagan before Christianity came and Charlemagne was not exactly peaceful with the native pagans. (And he also went against Christian teachings in “converting” the natives).
The “War on Terror” and 9/11 and many other terrorist attacks are false flag operations. Do you really think that 18 high-jackers, on their own, managed that?
This war is designed to help Israel in her messianic mission and the Modern West is the civilization that has been created by the Anti-Christ to give to Israel the status of ruling state.
Can you not see? The Modern West is anti-European! It has been responsible for the problems that you now complain about. (and in many cases rightly so). At the heart of this civilization is an unholy Judeo-Christian rapprochement.
For an effective solution, the European folks need to disentangle themselves form the Modern West and they should try to do so quickly because the Modern West has started committing suicide. But remember, the last Western European folk to try and liberate themselves were the N.S Germans and look what happened to them – Hellstorm! (Personally I am rather pessimistic about the future of Western Europe).
You may disregard the above, it may be because of the eschatological undertones or it may be something else. But do yourself a favor. Read this https://chechar.wordpress.com/2012/02/21/red-giant/
(Do note that I am not in agreement with all that is written however these Westerners have a MUCH better understanding of reality than you).
I could write more but it would be too long.
LikeLike
Islam spread by armed conquest. This is a fact accepted by all serious scholars and historians. There have been instances in which Islam was adopted by choice (in Anatolia, for example), but they are exceptional cases.
LikeLike
Are you kidding me? You really are clueless, either that or you are a coward and you are insincere to your people. Maybe you are a “cuckservative”?
Let us accept, for the sake of argument that Islam spread by the sword. How did Christianity spread through much of Western Europe? Charlemagne was hardly Christian in his conduct with pagan Europeans! How did the Teutonic knights spread Christianity in the Baltic?
The problems facing Western European societies are not due to Islam! These issues of replacement level immigrations and crimes done by Muslims on Europeans (which I strongly condemn) are but the symptoms and signs of a rot that set in long ago. That rot is the Anti-Christ civilization a.k.a The Modern West.
Have you not read the link? Is your head still stuck in the sand?
An engineered catastrophic collapse is heading its way and most Western Europeans are bloody oblivious! You must disentangle yourselves from that civilization. It will be difficult.
Those very few who survive will be those who understood – unlike you.
LikeLike
I’m not denying that Christianity has occasionally been imposed by force of arms. I just think it’s irrelevant. Those who committed violence in the name of the Church were acting against the principles of their faith as set down in the Christian Bible. They are deviants, not literalists. If you read the Christian Bible from start to finish, you will find no calls to annihilate non-believers and infidels, stone people to death or demean those of other points of view. This is something unique to (and characteristic of) the Islamic faith.
As to this European ‘Anti-Christ’ you keep bringing into the conversation, I don’t know how to respond. My guess is that he/she/it is wholly imagined.
LikeLike
Have you read the link? Huh? Have you?
I know that those who committed violence in the name of Christianity were going against the teachings of Christ (PBUH). I was trying to make a point but it seems that you cling to the corrupt Judeo-Christian viewpoint – that Islam is inherently violent. Anyway, it is irrelevant.
The problems that your societies face is NOT caused by Islam; be it perceived or actual. You do not have to accept the (Islamic) eschatological viewpoint regarding the nature of Modern Western Civilization. It may be you are secular or atheist. But, if you are interested, watch Sheikh Imran Hosein’s videos on youtube.
Seriously do yourself a favor. Read the link.
https://chechar.wordpress.com/2012/02/21/red-giant/
It is a non-Islamic and Western European viewpoint on the Modern West without any reference to the Anti-Christ. These people, who are no friends to Islam, have a better understanding of the nature of, what I call, the Anti-Christ civilization.
LikeLike
Are you denying that Islam is responsible for violence in the modern world? What about ISIS? What about al-Qaeda? What about Hezbollah? What about Hamas? What about the Taliban? What about the Chechen militias? What about the Pakistani groups attacking India?
LikeLike
Why are ISIS beheading Christians in Syria?
LikeLike
…explicitly in the name of Islam (I might add).
LikeLike
You have little understanding of your own civilization let alone others. To have a macroscopic understanding read Irshad Soofie and his “An Attack on the spiritual heart of Islam” and watch Sheikh Imran Hosein’s lectures. https://www.youtube.com/user/SheikhImranHosein/videos
You must understand the role of (Zionist) Saudi Arabia. She has back-stabbed the Muslim world and has been spreading poison. She has supported and financed “Islamic terror groups” all over the Muslim world including ISIS.
Saudi Arabia could not have done this without the explicit support of the Modern West! She was a client state of Britain and then America. In fact Britain created her just like Britain created Israel. Both Britain and America have deliberately supported Saudi Arabia (and other Muslim states that are compliant to their wishes like Turkey…especially Turkey and she is a part of NATO!) in spreading this poisonous ideology with the intention of spreading destabilization and mayhem in the Muslim world.
Why? Islamic eschatology will provide you with the answer.
A lot of these groups you mention have CIA/NATO black ops supporting them including the Chechen militias.
Why are ISIS beheading Christians in Syria? Islamic eschatology has the answer.
For microscopic understanding read these articles.
http://journal-neo.org/2014/12/01/america-s-real-ties-to-isis/
http://www.veteransnewsnow.com/2014/08/13/509305-isis-israel-and-us-duplicity/
http://martinezperspective.com/2015/07/us-israeli-imperialists-plot-downfall-of-syria-and-iran/
http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2014/09/turkey-israel-directly-supporting-isis-al-qaeda-syria.html
http://foreignpolicy.com/2014/06/11/exclusive-israel-is-tending-to-wounded-syrian-rebels/
http://www.jpost.com/Middle-East/Analysis-ISIS-is-no-threat-to-Israel-374538
ISIS are a needed bogeyman to serve ulterior agendas. One of which is to demonize (true) Islam. They are as Islamic as the Crusaders who set up the Latin Kingdom were Christian in their conduct.
LikeLike
I totally agree with your excellent article and I have posted it on my blog. Don’t think it could be stated any better. I have been following your blog for quite some time now. Just one question, in one paragraph where you state that “Western life…a million times superior. We are behaving rationally trying to protect it.” I assume you meant “irrationally” there? Thanks and keep up the good writing and standing for truth, liberty, and freedom. Zach Taylor at Zion’s Trumpet. United States way down in the heart of “Dixie”
LikeLiked by 1 person
We are behaving rationally in trying to protect our civilisation.
LikeLike
Thank you for sharing my work.
LikeLike
Pingback: Letter to the Muslims of Europe. | THE MEGAPHON...