Tags
America, America 911, American Liberty, Barack Obama, BBC, Britain First, Civilisation, Counter-Jihad, Defend the modern world, Donald Trump syria refugees, Europe, European Union, Facebook, facebook isis, Immigration, ISIS, ISIS europe, ISIS in America, ISIS refugees, Multiculturalism, Race and ethnicity in the United States Census, refugees, refugees or migrants, syrians, trump, Twitter, United States
With one curt reply, Donald Trump solved the conundrum of how Western leaders should react to the Syrian Immigration crisis. Instead of fumbling about for the right excuse, or degenerating into platitudinous psychosis, Trump met the contempt of the Left with a shield of toughest reason.
Should Trump become President in 2016, the Syrian refugees now headed to America (under Obama’s policy of general cultural surrender) will, he said, be made to leave. He gave no detail as to where they will go, but he was decisive (his jaunty, masculine tone never trembling) that they will go. Why? “They could be ISIS” he explained, and much to the chagrin of liberal press infiltrators, the audience receiving this news erupted into thigh-slapping approval.
“They could be ISIS” is such a straightforward, commonsensical rationale that the Left will surely pick at it ruthlessly in the weeks to come. Liberals, after all, don’t like common-sense; it’s far too reminiscent of the working classes they so despise (and pretend to represent). Liberals prefer (and will only listen to) lengthy, pseudo-intellectual theses from bespectacled East-Coast vegans (or even better, granola-crunching Scandinavian Leftists) composed in order to justify or extend the reach of government. Common sense just won’t cut it. Common sense doesn’t even have formal accreditation.
But this commonsensicalism is nevertheless the correct attitude for a prospective Presidential candidate to adopt. In politics, the issues are only as complicated as you choose to make them, and the Syrian immigrant debacle is at heart quintessentially simple. A country filled with hundreds of thousands of violent barbarians is busily issuing forth a stream of undocumented, unidentifiable strangers into the civilised world. The organisation responsible for the destruction of that source country has pledged its willingness to plant operatives in that human stream; their ultimate intention being to wreak a comparable havoc on Europe, as they already have on their own soil. When one considers the pastimes presently popular in ISIS-controlled territory (head-lopping, virgin rape, forced marriages, limb amputation among various others…), it is therefore the height of intellectual clarity to prevent the human stream from penetrating the borders of civilised nations.
I didn’t need to write any of that, of course. Trump made the same point with perfect austerity – “They could be ISIS”. As a statement, it can hardly be improved upon.
Still, if it helps the block-headed leftists better understand the point, perhaps Trump might in future use the analogy of contagious disease. If the human stream issuing from Syria was rumoured to contain carriers of Ebola or Bird Flu, the borders of the civilised world would surely re-appear as if by magic. It is the accepted responsibility of government to prevent the spread of disease where it is possible to do so. Why should this be treated any differently?
Islamisation is markedly worse than any organic malady. Once a country has been Islamised, that is usually how it will stay for many centuries. Ask the Albanians, the Bosnians or the Berbers. Unlike the treatment of a medical condition, overturning a cultural transformation is impossible without revolution, violence and chaos. Collected together, the number of historic deaths related to Islamic conquest – that is, from both Islamising and de-Islamising – runs into the wild millions.
And Islamic conquest is exactly what ISIS plans for us. If they need to move their wolves into position clad in wool, they will do. If they need to shed a few phoney tears for the Western press, they will do. Hell, they’ll almost certainly sacrifice children to the sea in order to forward this vile enterprise.
Any policy able to defend us against this process must be considered.
D, LDN
I massively and totally agree with what you say here. No need for me to elaborate, I just thunderously agree with what you have written. IF ONLY Donald Trump could become US President…if only!!! He’ll up against the Democratic Party Machine, almost certainly fighting for Hilary Clinton, that embodiment of the US political establishment. The liberal media will launch an all-out onslaught against him. And the ethnic minorities will probably not vote for him in any great numbers.
But who knows? The Donald might manage to overcome all of these obstacles.
I think he has what it takes. You’re right to note that the whole establishment will mobilise against him, but perhaps he is larger in stature than the establishment? That’s what I believe – and what I hope – to be the case.
Fox News have already tried their best to take him down. It didn’t work. Donald got the people to turn on Fox.
Finally a breath of fresh air..
A Western politician who finally understands as to who is the enemy and who is the friend of the West.
Indeed. Let’s hope the media smears fail.
Fox’s smear campaign failed miserably.
“Liberals, after all, don’t like common-sense; it’s far too reminiscent of the working classes they so despise (and pretend to represent). ”
That’s gone away a long time ago. They are risk-averse to waking hours. Our youth are ripe for a major opium sleep. It’s sad when that seems to be the only remedy to their otherwise micro-sensitive existence, always wanting to be cheered along and fondled.
Something happened… perhaps children intuitively realize what’s happening with forced multi-culti, that it is extreme character manipulation (tho they don’t know that exactly), and are feeling the repercussions. Hence, we may be dealing with an entire generation of shell-shocked and paranoid “privileged” people.
And Trump BTW is correct. The other day, he went as far as saying, “This could be the ultimate Trojan Horse, bigger than ever before in history!” (paraphrasing, but close, i’m sure.)
I don’t have to believe in conspiracy theories. We have real issues going on, bright as day.
Indeed. Trump is the only candidate who can be trusted to keep ISIS out of America.
And the other bloke in the presidential race who “gets” it is Ben Carson, who has taken aim at Sharia, and at CAIR. Maybe he and Trump should team up.
I think that’s certainly a possibility. Others are suggesting Trump-Cruz. Carson makes more sense. Cruz probably wouldn’t settle for Veep.