Tags
4chan, Assad, Bad blood, BBC, Britain First, Christianity and Islam, Civilisation, Coffee, Counter-Jihad, Counterjihad, Culture, Defend the modern world, Facebook, History, ISIS, ISIS ISIL, ISIS Islam, ISIS pictures, ISIS videos, Islam, Islamic State, Multiculturalism, politics, Race and ethnicity in the United States Census, reddit, UK, UKIP, YouTube
For the first time in a blue moon, Anglo-American liberals are telling the truth. Islamic State (or ISIS) are increasingly unpopular with ordinary Muslims. Although few can doubt that the actions of the terror regime are explicitly rooted in Quranic text, the exotic barbarism and random flashes of violence employed by its fighters are rarely endorsed by anyone outside of its own ranks. A swelling number of Muslim regimes (themselves backward and detestable in separate ways) are calling for the annihilation of the Caliphate, with some even looking to the infidel West for help in doing so.
The bigger picture here is fascinating. I’m starting to wonder if the very public cruelties of ISIS are causing a quiet crisis of identity for hundreds of millions of mildly devout believers. Magnifying the most extreme implication of this, I’m starting to wonder if ISIS may prove to be Islam’s fatal wound.
Islamic State is the Quran in action. That point is very important to understand. When you read the Quran, you are reading the basis for the blood-soaked terror currently engulfing Syria and Iraq. If you believe the text is endorsed by heaven, you are silently condoning the same slaughter. Now, I don’t believe that the majority of Muslims are stupid or lacking in humanity. Most of them are ordinary people, often very good-natured people, who have simply been brought up in a climate of ritualised stupidity. Given the deep roots of their cultural heritage, it was always going to take something frightful and extreme to make them question it. Has that ‘something’ now entered the stage of history?
Recall that Communism, as a philosophy and as an aspiration, declined greatly in the latter half of the Twentieth century. Most scholars agree that this process had something to do with the discovery (by historians and statisticians) of the Biblical-scale famines and state genocides of the first half of that century – events that were previously only rumors (deniable rumors). When faced with the realities of the Gulag even the most hard-hearted card-carrier began to wonder if his system of thought stood on faulty ground.
As ISIS continues to expose the consequences of applied Islam, even Saudi Arabia (the ideological source of many ISIS doctrines) finds itself swerving into panicked hypocrisy. Last month it was announced by Saudi officials that the Kingdom will be building a multi-million dollar wall spanning the entirety of its northern border to lessen the threat of an ISIS invasion.
The state of Jordan, after one of its pilots was murdered in the most bestial manner, has sworn to mobilise its military to crush the Islamic State. Egypt, having witnessed the spread of ISIS to neighbouring Libya, has brutally crushed Islamist forces within its own territory. In Tunisia, after Islamic State blew up a tourist destination in the capital city, the local population exploded in horrified shame and patriotic anger. Even Iran is warming to the West (and vice versa) as both powers seek to contain the same barbarism.
As someone who monitors these things, I have personally seen the membership of atheist groups rooted in Muslim countries swell in recent months. The citizenry of countries like Indonesia, Malaysia, Morocco, Bangladesh, Qatar, Bahrain and Algeria are increasingly aware of how fragile Islam makes their prized social peace and growing economic fortunes.
Has Islamic State – organised to promote and expand the domain of Islam – sent the religion into its death-spiral?
Food for thought.
D, LDN.
Let’s hope so. You’ve plainly set forth what this dilemma is about for the majority of muslims. The “islam or death” world view simply doesn’t work and goes against every human ethic most people share. For centuries, the islamic world has ignored the glorious past sitting in their own back yards or actively tried to erase it. Older, previous cultures being “haram” has motivated the most extreme and hideous destruction of historical sites and it’s been going on all through islam’s bloody existence. Ancient Persian customs have not completely disappeared from the supposedly devout Iran. In fact, there is probably more opposition to koranic commands there than anywhere, especially among the young; the opposite of young muslims in the West. Witness the enthusiastic embrace of Nowruz that the regime tolerates but really frowns upon. Let’s hope the growing number of apostate muslims can embrace the rich cultural heritage that they’ve been denied for so long and that it can instill a worthy pride in one’s culture and society as an opposing force to the hateful islam embodied by ISIS and others. It’s a start. Fingers crossed. We’re in for one bumpy ride.
LikeLike
I hope they will. It’s my belief (and my hope) that most Muslims remain human at heart and that ISIS behaviour shocks them as much as it does the rest of us.
LikeLike
I’m in agreement with you on this.
The Islamic State has, paradoxically, done the world one great favour. Before its rise, Muslims could, with a straight face, claim that Islam is a religion of peace, and that the terrorists of al Qaida, Hamas, Hezbollah (‘Did you mean “Ebola” ?’), Islamic State, Boko Haram, MILF (Moro Islamic Liberation Front, Philippines), al Shabab (Kenya) and their like, are either defending themselves against American/ Capitalist/ Zionist aggression and/or practice some perverted, extremist version of Islam. The rise of the Islamic State is focussing world attention on Islam like never before, and is creating a tectonic and polarising shift in public opinion, as can be seen on the comments sections of almost every online news story about Islam – where those comments are unmoderated by mainstream media editors, for whom, along with establishment politicians, it would appear the phrase “out of touch” was invented. In February 2015, the Islam Surveyed blog published the results of an exhaustive survey of UK media reader comments on stories about Islam . The survey covered leading newspapers and websites from both left and right, including the Guardian, Independent, Daily Mail, Spectator, Huffington Post UK and local media, from May 2014 to January 2015. It found not only that 80% of comments were distrustful and critical of Islam, but that these views were constant across all media surveyed. Only 5% of comments were sympathetic to Islam. In most cases, comments were moderated by media editors; it is likely that unmoderated comments would have been even more critical.
From How to Defeat the Islamic State
http://www.amazon.com/dp/B00WXIOS64/
LikeLike
The Mail Online (the most visited news website in the world) posts at least three ISIS horror stories per day. They are often shared thousands of times a piece. It must be having an effect.
LikeLike
It certainly is doing, even though their comment editors are difficult to penetrate beyond simplistic remarks like ‘shoot all IS’.
LikeLike
Yes, those kinds of comments are unhelpful.
LikeLike
Although I do support military action to destroy ISIS. I don’t want the Christians and other minorities to be wiped out.
LikeLike
My suggested military strategy in How to Defeat the Islamic State, is just 1 step of 12, and all about defending the borders or civilisation ie Greece, Israel, Lebanon, Libya (S Europe) etc
LikeLike
Pingback: Could Islamic State Kill Islam?
Let’s hope so! I am not an atheist but a religious believer, of a somewhat mystical, non-institutional kind. I have read that in Arabia prior to Mohammed a vague monotheism was slowly spreading, separate from Christianity. It would be wonderful if Islam could slowly lessen in intensity and morph into some kind of vague monotheism. Or alternately, if Islam could fragment into a thousand and one mystical sects, whose devotees had no interest in politics but were concerned only with private salvation.
LikeLike
There are many semi-Islamic sects – the Sufi, the Druze, the Alawite etc… Most are peaceful and are viewed as heretical by the Sunni.
LikeLike
Then again, I’d rather they abandon Islamic ideas altogether.
LikeLike
Christianity is making inroads in some Muslim countries. Malaysia and Indonesia etc…
LikeLike
With islam it’s a zero sum game. You cannot cherry pick what you like and discard the rest. You are either a muslim or you aren’t. By now we all know what the punishment for such apostate behaviour is: you guessed it, DEATH! Makes leaving the cult a bit difficult.
LikeLike
I agree. This is why we must encourage a clean break. Even pseudo-Islamic movements like Sufi are too close. They can always drift back to the same hatreds.
LikeLike
Dunno, there are so many muslims and leftists who continuously choke saying ´isis has nothing to do with islam´ that it really does seem many are still in denial. Did the Inquisition and the witch hunts kill christianity? I wish it did but it wasn’t the case.
LikeLike
They deny Islamic State are Islamic in public, but what about in private? There is a growing number of atheists in the Muslim world. They can’t escape the realities of Islamic belief in the age of the internet. At the moment, they’re too scared to speak out, but that won’t last forever.
LikeLike
In private, many of the fundamentalist Muslims (only the Sunnis though, the Shias hate them!. You can’t find better allies against the IS than the Shias!) admire the Islamic state.
The same person who claims that the Islamic state is ‘unIslamic’, will, if asked as to how the Islamic state is able win such ‘magnificent’ victories, as to how are they able to defeat armies 10 times larger than themselves , will reply that they are ‘Blessed by Allah!’ for their ’eman'(faith)
This contradiction as to why a supposedly ‘unIslamic’ organization is being ‘Blessed by Allah’ does not even enter their minds.
LikeLike
That is why, even though their propaganda value (for anti-Islamic purposes) is so high, ISIS must still be defeated. They are certainly secularising ‘moderate’ Muslims by the million, but they are also providing inspiration to young impressionable people (including non-Muslims). There is something romantic about how ISIS faces down the Syrians, the Kurds and the Iraqis/Iranians all at once. If ISIS, having caused all this cruelty, win through, the cruelty will be forgiven. If they lose, the cruelty will be even more exposed as pointless carnage.
LikeLike
We must strive to keep the memory of ISIS alive even after they have been dealt with. Communism was renounced mostly because of its cruelty, but also because of its pathetic failure. ISIS must remain an enduring example of Islamism’s failure in practice.
LikeLike
In a way, if Isis fails like communist states have failed, your theory might be valid… Let’s just bomb them already!
LikeLike
I agree. We need to take far more radical action than we are taking at present.
LikeLike
We can hardly rely on Sunni states to do it for us. Obama seems to think otherwise.
LikeLike
This same thought had crossed my mind, but its a lot easier to see the problems with a religion from outside of that religion. Mishal Husain (BBC newsreader) is here voicing support for the #notinmyname campaign:
http://www.theguardian.com/media/2014/oct/21/bbc-mishal-husain-social-media-isis
Clearly she’s had to have a little tiny think about it all, at least. Its better than nothing.
Just what a struggle apostates go through even in their own minds is revealed in this conference:
http://faithtofaithless.com/launchevent/
One even admits he was considering a terrorist attack in the UK at one time. He also says that secret ex-Muslims are everywhere.
LikeLike
I’m sure they are everywhere. I get a lot of traffic from Muslim countries.
LikeLike
Isis are washing the dirty laundry of Islam in public for all to see, and this is causing a nervous breakdown amongst Muslims living in the west. People need to hold their nerves. Simply keep exposing the evil of Islam, whilst simultaneously showing compassion to individual Muslims. Embolden and empower dissidents of Islam like Ayan Hirsi Ali. Fight the left wingers who attack dissenters of Islam. Keep showing that they seek to ban criticism of Islam, and its not just Islam that shall be damaged. The more that the Left seeks to defend Islam, in the eyes of the majority, the more the Left shall be damaged too. A double whammy.
LikeLike
I agree with all of that.
LikeLike
Finally!
This article is coming around to what some of us in the counter-jihad community have been saying for sometime.
We are in an ideological conflict.
And the best way to defeat a dysfunctional ideology is to let the proponents of the ideology to live in it. Wake them up from their dreams of utopia of a ‘perfect society’ and push them in to the reality of the contradictions of their own ideology.
For example, if I had been the (smart & perceptive) Tsar of Russia before WW1, I would have invited the Communists & Socialists of all varieties and given them some territory and let them run their territory according to the doctrines of Das Kapital.
In 20 years, the said territory would have been ravaged with infighting, genocide and famine, because there is no other way to motivate a Communist society except through fear, because, if you remove the greed out of the ‘Greed & Fear’ motivational polarity, you are only left with fear!
Only when people get out of their ideological dreams and smell the shit of reality that their ideology produces, can we really convince them that their ideology is full of shit!
The ideology of modern Islamists is essentially anti-Intellectual & anti-modern, yet we in the free world allow the foremost proponents of this ideology, the Saudi Wahabbhis to enjoy the benefits of a modern free thought-based world and at the same time allow them to spread their anti-modern ideology. This contradiction & hypocrisy must be stopped.
It’s as if there are a people with an ideology that is against modern evidence-based medicine. They have an entire propaganda division devoted to this ideology. They carry on attacks on doctors & scientists who are involved in modern medicine. But, when they themselves get injured or diseased, they demand and get the most advanced modern medical treatment.
In many ways ISIS puts an end to this hypocrisy. Though they are still hypocrites in using modern weapons and modern communication technology, their hypocrisy is far less than that of the Saudi Wahabbis.
LikeLike
Well said.
LikeLike
Meanwhile the Saudi’s are building a fence along their Northern border to keep out the Islamic State(rs)…the contradiction of the Wahabbists will come undone, and its likely to be in a more subversive manner than they could ever expect.
Perhaps a different thoroughly modern technology will expedite this process: the internet.
Presently the (other modern) spanner in the works is OIL.
As long as both the Wahabbists and IS can smell the oil (as opposed to the shit, which won’t have an odur till the oil runs out) – they are unlikely to effect radical change in a hurry though.
LikeLike
Actually, I withdraw my comment. It was written in haste and is in bad taste.
LikeLike
OK.
LikeLike
Let’s hope islam will be destroyed soon. It doesn’t deserve any better.
LikeLike
Indeed.
LikeLike
Forgot to mention that in my previous post, but it seems like 81% of Saudis support ISIS. The same is true for French and UK muslims. So we may have to wait forever till they voluntarily abandon islam.
http://www.breitbart.com/national-security/2015/05/25/shock-poll-81-of-al-jazeera-arabic-poll-respondents-support-isis/
16% of all french support IS, i.e. >80% of the 6% muslims:
http://www.newsweek.com/16-french-citizens-support-isis-poll-finds-266795
7% of all Brits support IS, i.e. >60% of the 5% muslims:
http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2014/10/16/islamic-state-arab-nations-britain-support_n_5995548.html
LikeLike
Sometimes the questions on those surveys are loaded. I do think, whatever they say in public, Muslims are hugely confused about ISIS. They can’t quite condemn it yet, but a great number will do as time goes on.
LikeLike
I don’t know. It may be obvious that the blunt terror of IS frightens even the kingdom of Saudi Arabia, but is the concept of islam that they promote and sustain so much better? There is even this undeniable tendency in Islamic countries to go back to the basics: unconditional oppression of women, a firm application of sharia law and harsh punishments for criticism of the religion. i think the only possible solution is to ban the book. Cause the book seems to create a mindset that is downright dangerous in its volatility: the moderate muslim of today can be an extremist tomorrow
LikeLiked by 1 person
I think the House of Saud aren’t really Muslim at all. They’re playboys. Many of them use drugs, drink alcohol and sleep with Western prostitutes. ISIS threaten them because they’re authentic about Sharia.
LikeLike
okay, but until further notice, they are the ones with the power to impose their version of islam upon the people. And it is a very strict version. Moreover, they try to spread this fundamentalistic version by funding mosques in the west, providing wahabist imams, supporting terrorist groups. Only when these countries realize and admit that it is islam that hinders them to grow, and prosper, a real solution might be in sight.
LikeLike
True.
LikeLike
http://pamelageller.com/2016/05/kosovo-the-new-jihad-state-in-the-heart-of-europe.html/
LikeLike