Tags
BBC, Britain First, Christianity and Islam, Civilisation, Counter-Jihad, Counterjihad, Demographics of Europe, Facebook, instagram, Islam in America, Islam in Europe and America, Islamisation of Europe, Multiculturalism, Muslims, Muslims demography, Muslims in Europe, No to Turkey in the EU, pinterest, Race and ethnicity in the United States Census, Twitter
While all Western European nations are currently enduring a process of Islamisation, not all face the same kind of process. By this I mean that Europe is not facing conquest by a single race, nation or even Islamic school. There are varieties of colonisation, and it is important and worthwhile to look at each one in isolation.
Despite the end-point being the same in all cases, some of these processes are worse than others in the short term. Each Muslim sub-culture goes about Islamisation in a different way, with a different level of enthusiasm, with differing levels of unnecessary cruelty, and with a different potential for success.
Here then is an analysis of four cases, noting the character of each individual process and how they differ from each other.
Germany – Turkish Muslims.
Only 75 years ago, the city of Nuremburg was the setting for the National Socialist Party’s most glittering rallies. Red, white and black Swastika flags billowed sideways down the walls of banks, libraries and municipal offices. In public squares, speeches extolling notions of ethnic supremacy – or more specifically, of German supremacy – brought gathered crowds to a state of thoughtless euphoria. German-ness, Aryan-ness, and Nordic-ness ruled as unquestionable virtues, exalted above all other considerations.
Today, the city is ostensibly democratic, free and modern. There are no mad theories to intoxicate the public blasted from tannoy speakers; no banners with flashy symbols designed to replace the task of thinking. But there are also fewer and fewer Germans to be found.
Nuremberg is increasingly a Turkish city, with Turkish shops, Turkish eateries and a Turkish character. In a 2011 study, more than 37% of the urban population have an immigrant background, with Muslim Turks accounting for the vast majority.
A similar process has occurred in various other cities across the nation. There are now over 1,500,000 Turks resident in Germany and this population has a birth rate way in excess of the slovenly rates of the Germans themselves. In fact, this is worth recounting in detail. The birth rate for German natives is 1.4 children per woman. For Muslim Turks on the other hand, it is above replacement level (2.4). If that weren’t frightening enough, due to national infertility, the native German population is slated to decline every new decade, requiring – if the worker-retiree ration is to be maintained – yet more immigration. And where is the main source of that immigration predicted to be? (You guessed it) Turkey.
Now, while the Turks are not always as criminal and aggressive as other European Muslim populations, they do account for more crime than other citizens, and the meteoric rise in groups like Pegida testifies to the sheer panic running through the minds of native communities.
Unless Germany finds a way to reverse its demographic collapse, or (just as well) decides to turn to another source of human replenishment, the prospects of an enlightened, Judeo-Christian future there seem really rather dim.
The United Kingdom – Pakistani Muslims.
In case you are unaware, the British ‘commonwealth’ is a compensatory ’empire of consent’, chiefly maintained in order to keep alive the idea of British global influence. Of the many countries included in this club, most are pleasant enough (Canada, Australia, India etc..), but one or two have fared very badly under the conditions of self-rule. Unstable, barely democratic and economically barren, the Islamic Republic of Pakistan has undoubtedly fared the worst. For this reason, over time a very large (and fertile) contingent of Muslim Pakistanis have flocked to the shores of England (note: not Scotland, Northern Ireland or Wales). As recorded in 2011, there are 1,500,000 Pakistanis living in England and most are clustered in urban areas like Leicester, Bradford, Birmingham, Luton and metropolitan parts of Yorkshire.
I’ll pull no punches here. The Muslim Pakistani population of this country are its most disliked, in some cases detested, constituent. Mass rape, paedophilia, corruption, low-level crime, bullying, harassment, stalking, sexual intimidation, terrorism and racist anti-Kafir violence have collectively served to bar the integration of Muslim Pakistanis into English (or British) life.
Muslim Pakistanis in the UK are often radical, prone to extremist views and actions, and intent on cultural conquest. I would venture that they are far more disruptive to English life that the Turks in Germany are to German life. While German Turks are rarely found to be members of violent Jihadi groups, British Pakistanis are arrested every day for such membership. Reflecting this, the largest ‘European’ contingent in the Islamic State’s ranks are British and Pakistani.
France – Maghrebi Muslims.
When the French colonial grip on the nation of Algeria began to loosen, some Algerians (in the hope of a better life) began to migrate to the land of their colonial masters. Since then, they have been joined by millions of other Maghrebis (including Muslims from Morocco, Tunisia, Libya and Mauritania).
Today, the full figure of North African Muslims in France is unknowable, owing to a French ban on collecting ethnic data. Some estimates put the figure at 4 million, some at 5, others (on the political right) claim it could be as high as 8 million. Whatever the exact number, the transformation of many French cities is obvious and extreme. Marseille and Paris are dominated by immigrants. The number of Mosques in France is rapidly catching up with the number of churches. Despite a very brave and sensible ban, the veil is still a common sight in poorer suburbs.
Like British Pakistanis, the French North Africans have earned a solid reputation for aggressiveness and obedience to the criminal impulse. In 2005, much of urban France was set on fire, as Muslim youths rampaged through the streets of cities smashing buildings, vehicles and police officers (some – notably – shouting ‘Jihad!’ when doing so).
Despite this, and unlike UK Pakistanis, some North Africans in France have begun to integrate in recent years, much in the same way as African-Americans eventually integrated into America – that is, via sport, television and rap music.
Unlike the Arabs and Berbers, the French natives are increasingly atheistic and whether this makes Islamisation easier or more difficult remains to be seen. In my personal opinion, having a religious identity to defend is crucial if one is to resist conquest by another.
Sweden – Pick n’ Mix
By 2050, over one in ten Swedes will pray facing Makkah. This is an astonishing fact, and one that, only forty years ago, would have seemed absurdly dystopian. Unlike France, Germany and the UK, there is no single source of Muslim migration to Sweden. In the capital and in all major cities, one will find communities of Kurds, Iranians, Turks, Syrians, Pakistanis, Iraqis and North Africans.
This variety, though it may not seem as much now, is potentially good news for Sweden. As any worldly observer will realise, for Islamists to forge an Islamic coalition of Iranians and Arabs, Turks and Kurds, Pakistanis and Bangladeshis, Sunni with Shia, is a very tall order indeed. For that reason, I think Islamisation will be a fragmentary and slow process in Scandinavia, albeit one that must nevertheless be actively and energetically opposed.
Conclusion.
Based on a continent-wide analysis, the more homogenous the Islamising force a country faces, the greater the violence and cruelty will be along the process. In Britain, the Pakistani community are emboldened by their local homogeneity – something that allows for confidence and common aspiration against the interests of outer-communal rivals. The same is true in Germany with the Turkish community. If tensions between the Turks and the German police (which are already strained) inflame further, the Turks will be able to retaliate with a common front, potentially leading to ‘Bradford riots’ kind of scenario.
In France, the North Africans are socially merging with the Black Africans – with whom they already share many cultural traits. If this continues, Black Hip-Hop culture may in time dilute the commitment to Islamic virtues that are incompatible with it. If not, then the North Africans may find enough in common with each other to pursue a united Islamising effort.
Finally, Sweden, despite playing host to a massive and growing Islamic community, has not been transformed to the extent of Britain and France. This must be for a reason. The explanation I would advance is that inter-Islamic divisions (racial and theological) inflame just as much passion in Muslim migrants as does the division of Muslim and non-Muslim. While this is advantageous in the short term, the likely end result – namely, the formation of what Christopher Caldwell called a multi-ethnic ‘Team Islam’ – promises to be every bit as destructive as the homogenous conquests ongoing in other European societies.
D, LDN.
Reblogged this on ElderofZyklon's Blog!.
LikeLike
Cj aka Eldersofzyklon is an anti-semitic sight that is reposting your work here. If I were you I would block this garbage from posting. Take a look at it. Sickening.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you for your opinion, please feel free to share more lol! 🙂
LikeLike
I see you have a bias of course due to your obvious raging Semitism! 😀
LikeLike
Attempting to revive religion will not solve this. Getting people back to work will. If people have to work and run businesses they are forced to mix with people of other opinions and their beliefs will become less important to them. They will drop the veil and other obviously Muslim clothes once they realise they find it hard to get a job wearing them, and without a job they will have nothing to eat. Without the state to support the die-hard anti-westerners you may even see immigration heading in the opposite direction. Over 50% of Muslim men and 75% of Muslim women are unemployed.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/8054403/Britains-coping-classes-at-breaking-point.html
LikeLike
I hope you’re right, but then again the veil ban in France (which forbids the wearer gaining mainstream employment) doesn’t seem to have worked. People still wear it and the amount of police time wasted on trying to sanction people is considerable. Perhaps it needs to be more rigorously enforced. How about – If you wear it, you’re given a massive fine. If you emigrate, the fine is cancelled in full.
LikeLike
They still wear it because the welfare system allows them to avoid work. If the threat of a criminal conviction meant they could lose their only source of income, they would think again.
LikeLike
You mean cease welfare payments to those who break the law? I’d certainly go with that.
LikeLike
No although that would be a small start. What I’m saying is that people in work are less likely to break the law because employers usually take a very dim view when their employees break the law. The welfare state was created as a safety net for when people fell on hard times, but its become a permanent way of life for whole communities. We have second and third generations now of families who have never worked. Muslims particularly are taught by their religion to despise our society, so it should come as no surprise when some of them see no problem with abusing the safety net and using it as a permanent source of income. 21% have never worked apparently. I can tell that you are defensive about welfare, but maybe you could at least admit there should be limits on it, maybe it should be time limited to say a year perhaps?
LikeLike
I more or less agree. It’s going to be extremely difficult to change the welfare rules, but at least George Osborne is willing to try. That’s one upside of the Tory government – the lazy Muslims will eventually find the well runs dry.
LikeLike
when we talk of the Islamisation of Britain, what we’re really talking about is the ‘Pakistani-isation’ of Britain. And the Islam of Pakistan is truly horrific. The hateful, intolerant, misogynist, honour-killing culture, that breeds rape gangs, jihadis and criminality because of hate of the ‘kuffar’
The Islam of Pakistan is already primed to hatred because it is an Islam that believes in the ‘Two Nation Theory’ that saw India partitioned because Muslims didn’t want to live with the ‘filthy’ Hindus and Sikhs. That Islam has been transposed to Britain, the Pakistani Islam of supremacist hate of the ‘filth’ of unbelievers, to such a horrific consequence.
LikeLike
Indeed, Pakistani Muslims belong mostly to sects like the Deobandi school – a type of Islam just as extreme as Wahhabism.
LikeLike
Britain was mad to let in people from a state founded on the idea of religious supremacism.
LikeLike
If Europeans slowly disappear, Europe will be left with a) people who have no clue and thus devolve to more primitive behaviors and work ethics (Sharia well-suited for that, so perhaps it’s not a mistake), or b) they actually do have plenty rocket-scientists after all, and not only successfully take over Europe, but also send the first astronaut to the newly-discovered inhabited planet outside the solar-system… and we’ll look so stupid for not having been able to foresee all that intellectual capacity and ingenuity in their otherwise current victimized state.
Of course, i am being extremely sarcastic, but then think of this: If you were a Muslim coming to Europe or anywhere in the Western World, and the nitwits let you do whatever you wanted, especially after you use their own laws against them AND succeed in establishing victim-hood, wouldn’t you be kind of stupid not to take advantage of that by not conquering the over-welcoming f*ckers who are merely desperate for retirement-fund replenishment? Who are the lazy ones resting on their laurels, if NOT the West?
LikeLike
It’s a great shame. I certainly think we are encouraging the Muslims by our liberal attitudes. Donald Rumsfeld’s saying “Weakness is provocative” is a favourite of mine. It’s very true.
LikeLike
Then there’s this: There really is a PTB, NWO, or whatever, (ie, Davos people, Bilderbergers, etc), and they’ve decided Westerners are just too damned expensive to keep as pets anymore.
LikeLike
BTW, and again, i have been a bit sarcastic, but this same thing is happening in the USA – wherein the voters actually believe their horse (POTUS, Congress, etc) protects them from the evils of society – meaning, if you’re a Dem, your politicians protect you from the crazy religionists looking to put a chastity belt on women and to burn gays at the stake, or, if you’re a GOP, your politicians protect you from the Bolshies and the elimination of the US Constitution, etc…
The joke is on us – we cannot trust any of these people, as it’s been going down hill for a few decades, and so the best we can say is: The Dems have gotten us to socialism and the silencing of speech faster, but the GOP have gotten us to weapons races and digital securitization faster. Both of them, i feel, have gotten us to this globalization crapola, particularly in the digital realm, as the one loves to mix everyone together in unified rebellion while the other loves to do business anywhere it’s a steal.
I could be wrong, but it seems like this train has left the station and all this psychoanalysis ain’t gonna help… time to mesh in, simply, and work with what we got. Look out for number one, under their noses, best we can. What else can there be left to do? It’s that, or if there are enough fed-up and brave Westerners, a global barroom brawl on everyone’s street???
LikeLike