Tags
Civilisation, Counter-Jihad, Counterjihad, Defend the modern world, Extremism in London, Hezbollah, ISIS, ISIS brits, Islamic Extremism, Islamism, Jew 9/11, Jews 9/11, Jihadi John, London Metropolitan, London University, Middlesex, Mohammad Emwazi, Muslims, Palestine, Religion, The Beatles ISIS, United Kingdom, Universities, Westminster
The revelation that the frozen-blooded ISIS executioner ‘Jihadi John’ was until recently a ‘normal, quiet’ student at Westminster University couldn’t have surprised me less. I am very intimate with the state of London Universities and the close, sinister relationship many of their students have with radical Islam.
I didn’t attend Westminster, but my own University was just a few miles from it. Along with Greenwich, London Metropolitan and my own, Westminster University is part of an ever-growing variety of crowded, multicultural colleges popping up around the English capital like Starbucks restaurants.
Given their demographic profile (the Islamic percentage of the intake is often as high as 50%) all of these institutions are sharply Left-wing in political orientation, with some of them allied to the wild extreme.
At my own place of study, I don’t remember a week going by without a demonstration for ‘Palestine’, against blasphemy or in favour of immigration. During these events, bearded enforcers in white dresses (some of whom came in from other colleges) would stalk the halls of the campus, its library and halls of residence. To have been openly critical of Islam at this time would invite the same consequences as in ISIS-controlled Syria.
It has been noted before (including in the excellent book ‘Londonistan’ by Mail columnist Melanie Philips) that the Muslim youths of London are particularly devout, even by the standards of other European cities like Paris and Berlin. Consequently, at demonstrations by my college’s Islamic Student Union, leaflets spoke openly of Jihad, ‘infidels’ and religious para-militarism. Some Muslim students blamed the Jews for 9/11, others took credit for it proudly.
The non-Muslim students were mostly shy and timid, bullied into silent acquiescence by a thick atmosphere of violent potential. Once, on my way to a lecture, I saw a student in front of me wearing a Hezbollah hoodie (‘Hezbollah’ in roman script, lest there be any confusion) and when I promptly pointed this out to a fellow non-believer from my class, he said he thought it was ‘cool’…
Despite having been established as places of free-thought and learning, the Universities of London have more-or-less adapted to suit the bigotries of the fanatics. The year before last, London Metropolitan University banned the consumption of alcohol on its campuses due to complaints from Muslim students, thereby radically altering the traditional student experience for those from other backgrounds.
At my own place, a harmless ‘Valentine’s Day Singles’ Ball’ at the local nightclub was abruptly cancelled after complaints from the Muslim Union alleged that it might ‘promote un-Islamic behaviour’. Never did it seem to cross the minds of the student office that non-Muslims still (at least officially) have rights in the UK; that the UK is a modern, secular country, and that Islam is foreign to it.
This atmosphere of censorship quickly developed to affect the process of education itself. During my first month of study, I noticed there was a small section of books in the library devoted to atheism (‘The God Delusion’, ”The End of Faith’, ‘Letter to a Christian Nation” etc…). As months turned into years, that section of books seemed to mysteriously disappear. Perhaps that attests to a booming atheism on campus; perhaps they were being borrowed continuously by eager secularists. Or perhaps something else was occurring… Perhaps unbelief was being rooted out, just like alcohol, pork and innocent social gatherings before it.
For all their faults, the Conservative Party has sought to address the London University problem in the last few years, albeit in a very light-handed and incomplete fashion. MPs, including cabinet members, have acknowledged that some places of study are functioning as immigration waiting camps, in which people from the worst countries in the world use their brief window of legal residence to apply for permanent residency, and failing that, a life of illegal settlement.
Certainly, many of the students in my accommodation professed a will to remain beyond their graduation, or even if that day never came. The countries of their descent were all plagued with sadness or barbarity – one guy was from Sudan, another from Pakistan, one hailed from Iran, another from Albania. What do we expect these people to do? Is it not fair to say that allowing a Black man from Sudan to study in Britain in the era of the Janjaweed is to make certain he never leaves? It is obvious what is going on in London and it is going on right under the noses of the powerful.
What can we do about it? Here are a few common sense suggestions:
- Close down any college or ‘language school’ that fails to attract students from inside the EU.
- Block (through legislation at the governmental level) any attempt to ban alcohol, pork or other Haram products at British universities.
- Rigorously enforce the intermingling of the sexes. Never allow sexual segregation in lectures, places of rest or in common areas.
- Expel any student who actively promotes terrorism or anti-Semitism.
- Ban the Niqab on all University grounds.
- Offer security services to Christian and Jewish student unions and provide guards at pro-Israel or anti-Jihad events.
- Create a branch of student services dedicated to helping the victims of Muslim grooming or intimidation.
- Redefine the talk of ‘infidels’ for what it is – hate speech.
Despite how bad all this must sound, it is still too early to despair. While Jihadi John is undeniably a product of London’s degraded environment, so – in many ways – is this author. I went into higher education as a damp liberal, but emerged as something different. Perhaps the swamp, as well as being a factory-line of violent Jihadis, will also turn out radicals of the other direction.
We must hope so.
D, LDN.
evidently, ramming the masses through into high society is a failed remedy in taming the savage breast, but then again, what did we expect? it was Group W, after all, who remained on as professors, and they were never exactly part of polite society…
LikeLike
I have a feeling the government is well aware of what’s going on. They might be pursuing a divide and conquer strategy to contain the population. Nothing else makes sense. I don’t believe they are ignorant.
LikeLike
I am missing your point then, I guess, as to WHY all this is?? What’s behind the stratagem? Divide and conquer for what purpose?
LikeLike
It’s just a guess. The government isn’t stupid. They must realise what is going on. Divide and conquer the population by breaking them into conflicting blocs, and thus weaken the power of the people.
LikeLike
Well, then it’s to create a world-totalitarian government worse than any monarchy or communism we’ve seen. Would that Agenda21 play into this idea?
LikeLike
I’m not sure about Agenda 21, but the governments of the world are increasingly interconnected. That’s good and bad, I suppose. The UK should work in concert with America and other like-minded nations on some issues. However, transnational regimes like the EU are unacceptable because they threaten the integrity of the nation-state.
In the context of domestic politics, Liberal governments (like the supposedly ‘Conservative’ regime we have now) often push multiculturalism because it divides the population into manageable pieces, making rebellion against the state much more difficult.
There are other motivations for supporting mass-immigration, most of them equally sinister. The UK labour party has deliberately imported immigrants with the intention of boosting their own vote, for example. Immigrants vote, more often than not, for the Left. It’s similar to how the Democrats in America look kindly on Mexican immigration. Mexicans routinely vote for their party.
LikeLike
Ok, I understand. This is why I gave up on the Dems in the US. Unfortunately, I also feel the same way you do about the “conservative” party, as well. It doesn’t really matter much anymore, and what brings many of us to that conclusion is this confusing situation of mass immigration, 3rd worlders avenging themselves against the West, and the two parties’ disagreeing on a number of domestic & foreign policies, while no one “seems” to be able to do anything about it, as if everyone’s gone retarded. Add to this the climate change tensions.
Must be nice to have armed guards around while campaigning for the next election that promises to fix everything.
And so, one must ask if it would not be better for us to completely ignore politicians and voting altogether…
LikeLike
I think it would be dangerous to boycott politics completely. There are still bright lights in American politics at least, if not this side of the Atlantic. What do you think about Rand Paul? I don’t like his foreign policy ideas, but on immigration, abortion and gun rights, he seems pretty sound.
LikeLike
CT
LikeLike
It is extraordinary to think that all of this is happening right here in England. The Islamists have two powerful groups of allies among the indigenous population 1. gullible liberals, who insist on believing that Islam is basically a moderate creed, despite all evidence to the contrary 2. radical leftists, who see Islam as a tool by means of which they can further destablise Western civilisation.
The measures that you propose are all commendable and I fully support them. But in the long run I think that a more definitive solution is required. I saw a Muslim spokesman in France recently saying that some Muslims there were so demoralised by the hostility towards them that they were thinking of leaving. If this be true, then there are grounds for hope. An actively encouraged ‘re-migration’ may not be altogether unrealistic.
LikeLike
That is certainly cause for hope. I think a more intensely Islamophobic environment could persuade many millions to go voluntarily. I also think that public talk of deportation would cause a cascade of apostates desperate to remain here. That will naturally separate the good from the bad, the loyal from the disloyal.
LikeLike
He’s the conservative or libertarian-right favorite but not the mainstream GOP favorite. I don’t know if he’d get the nomination and he hasn’t mentioned running as a 3rd Party nominee. What I think? I think there’s hardly anyone to trust, but a Rand Paul admin would likely push for some radical changes regarding the IRS and Fed Res. I doubt how successful those would be, esp if he winds up getting the same treatment in Congress as BHO did/does now… Something about Paul I don’t trust. I think his roots go too far back to the powdered hair-set of the south.
I think I like Marco Rubio better. He seems less rigid, has a personality, is smart, understands immigrants, understands about assimilating, dislikes commies, and is more interested in US leading in the world. (This is not about being “better-than” but because we already have the biggest arsenal and tech know-how.)
LikeLike
Yes, perhaps Rubio would be better for American in the world. I just struggle to see him being backed by the GOP base because of his support for immigration reform.
LikeLike
Oh i don’t think he’ll get the $$ for it. Not this time, anyway.
LikeLike
This is chilling and an eye-opener. I had read some reports of these types of trends but its another thing to read as it were a first hand account. I think it demonstrates on a smaller scale how the creeping transformation of the UK could take hold more widely. Its astonishing how the previously loud voices of feminists are mostly strangely meek on the issue of gender segregation.
Its also got me wondering if the higher concentration of potential jihadis in the capital is having an unseen effect on our politicians. Could it be that this increased fear is helping to colour attitudes in Westminster, and slowing the much-needed reform of the welfare system that is so much a part of these problems all across Europe:
http://www.thecommentator.com/article/5689/jihadi_john_should_also_be_known_as_moocher_mohammed
LikeLike
I certainly think the population of London exerts greater influence on our politicians than those elsewhere. As to our politicians being afraid of Muslims, I fear you are correct.
LikeLike
The Feminist silence on sexual segregation in Islam is disgraceful.
LikeLike
This non-discriminatory immigration policy of the Western elite, allowing immigration of people filled with hatred towards their countries, civilization & culture, people who have always regarded Europe as the other side of enemy lines(The Dar-Al-Harb) or Abode of War, who always considered Europe as an ‘unfinished’ business, will be considered by future Europeans as foolish & treacherous & ultimately disastrous as the interlocking alliance system before WW1 or the appeasement policy before WW2!
LikeLike
I think the complete removal of Islam from the UK is the only moral solution, since the English were never consulted about this transformation of their society, and it is outrageous for it to have been imposed on them by newcomers. Those should never have come to this country if they did not do so because they were attracted to, and happy to accept, its character and traditions – that is colonisation. There is no place for the backward idiocy and barbarity that is Islam.
But the situation is now almost out of control due to the sheer weight of numbers across our cities and ghettos, also due to economic and diplomatic factors. The will to remove Islam does not even seem to be there from the electorate (whom Labour have of course been successful in replacing), let alone politicians. Were we even to try to ban Islam then the EU would be taking us to court, and we would likely face serious economic (not least oil supply) problems. Muslims would riot and commit more crimes than usual, but this could be contained through our military – again only if the public and state will were there.
This catastrophe for the West happened gradually, so may be best undone gradually starting with the measures you suggest. A slow but increasing restriction on Islam in the UK. Maybe that will save us, because it seems any swifter removal of Islam would trigger global conflict, until – possibly – it was eradicated worldwide.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I agree. This is a bomb that can be diffused bit by bit. Chaos can (and should) be avoided. The first essential measure is to declare that Islamic culture and Western culture are incompatible. As things heat up, I am confident that we will see many defections from Islam. Deep down, even Muslims know that Britain has a right to retain its culture.
LikeLike
> To declare that Islamic culture and Western culture are incompatible.
I think such a frank declaration, while obviously true, may cause a flashpoint – but then it is going to have to be made at some point.
> Deep down, even Muslims know that Britain has a right to retain its culture.
That’s a good observation – I have seen evidence of its truth when I’ve read Muslim forums. Could we get Leftists to agree though?!
LikeLike
Leftists are fighting a lost cause. Look at the comments under Guardian articles. They are increasingly reactionary. Leftist ideology is losing its appeal – except on economic issues.
LikeLike