Tags
Black crime rates, Darren Wilson, Defend the modern world, Ferguson Missouri, Ferguson riots, MIchael Brown, Militarisation of Police, Obama Ferguson, Officer, Police military, Race and ethnicity in the United States Census, Race riots, Rihanna Muslim, United States, USA
As I write this, riots are convulsing through the small Missourian city of Ferguson. The attributed cause of this disorder concerns the suicide-by-police officer of a young African-American man called Michael Brown.
According to unbiased sources, the story goes something like this: Michael Brown, a known thug, violently resisted the enquires of a police officer (Darren Wilson), called him a pussy and dared him to shoot him. After a short pursuit, the situation ended abruptly when Wilson opened fire and killed Brown, allegedly while the 18 Year old’s hands were raised.
From the moment the case was reported in the press, the African-American grievance machine has been rolling at full speed. Clergymen, politicians, Leftist celebrities and uncountable ‘community leaders’ have asserted Brown’s complete innocence, with some going so far as to describe the shooting as ‘racially motivated’.
Yesterday (Tuesday), the press-soaked hearing of Officer Wilson found that he had acted within the law and had not transgressed reasonable limits of behaviour. Predictably, the verdict set off a flame-orgy of violent improvisation in and around Ferguson. Businesses have been looted, cars set on fire. The exact measure of the damage is still being calculated.
This is all very familiar isn’t it? Why does this keep on happening? Why has it occurred in such varied locations as Detroit, Los Angeles, London, Manchester, Chicago and Paris?
Something is certainly going on for this kind of tragedy to continually befall the same community. Are Western police innately racist? This is certainly the insinuation of the protestors. Is that it? Racism?
No. It isn’t. Blacks are not being unfairly victimised. The real explanation – and the one that will never be offered in the sanitised half-sleep of the media – is biology.
Scientists are in no doubt whatsoever about the differing levels of testosterone in the racial groups of man. They know full well that Africans have a greater propensity to aggression and criminality than other ethnic groups, and they are only stopped from saying so by the vicious mafia-like intimidation of the Academic Left.
Blacks commit more crimes (proportionate to their numbers) than Whites. This is why a greater percentage of Blacks are in prison than Whites and Asians.
This isn’t a romantic truth, I know. It provides no heroes and villains. It can’t be set to music. You can’t change it with a riot.
It is the truth nevertheless.
D, LDN.
Defend the Modern World 
Much like when ‘St Duggan’, the patron saint of drug dealers was perforated by the Police. I worked in London at the time and the morning after the first evenings ‘peaceful protesting’, there wasn’t a shop in Woolwich that still had it’s front windows, or, indeed, any of it’s stock left.
Have you noticed, as the BBC news output has focussed on little else for the last week or so, he is always referred to as the ‘unarmed black teenager’.
If you look at the footage of the bloke turning the shop over, he looks like a huge, aggressive black thug, the type you could throw a stick down Lewisham High street and hit ten of. I wouldn’t want to step up to him, and I’m 6 feet tall and kick box twice a week.
LikeLike
True, the media reliably distorts these things. Duggan was a gangster, and this guy Brown was known to have robbed a convenience store.
LikeLike
“Scientists are in no doubt whatsoever about the differing levels of testosterone in the racial groups of man”
First I’ve heard of it. Can you provide some references?
LikeLike
http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/content/85/6/506.extract
http://www.airlats.com/testosterone/
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0039128X92900325
http://robertlindsay.wordpress.com/2009/06/06/black-males-and-testosterone-evolution-and-perspectives/
LikeLike
Thanks but I don’t think your references support your statement
“Scientists are in no doubt whatsoever about the differing levels of testosterone in the racial groups of man”.
It all seems a lot more complicated than that:
Ref 1. Accepts a difference in the samples tested but seems to favour environmental factors like diet and stress.
Ref 2. Difficult to put too much reliance on a review of studies by an author who gives an email address at a university but no scientific credentials that I can see. Even so, he finds no differences in testosterone, only in enzymes and receptors that respond to testosterone.
Ref 3. In the abstract which is all I can see (and I’m not paying $39.95 for the full article!) he says there is a difference but does not say which way. Considering the subjects are Vietnam vets and (according to Ref 4) after the early 30’s Blacks have less testosterone than Whites it can’t be taken for granted.
Ref 4. The author is not a scientist so I treat his claims as little more than speculations.
He says that Blacks have more testosterone from age 7-33, thereafter Whites have more so, as he admits, testosterone cannot simply be used to explain greater criminality after 33.
Also the fact that he proposes a totally unethical and impracticable experiment of tinkering with testosterone levels in black women’s wombs doesn’t inspire confidence.
So far so confusing, but looking at it from the other side I would ask what explains the differing levels of criminality in the West between Muslim Pakistanis and Hindu or Sikh Indians. They are the same people but with different cultures. I think Lindsay would be hard put to exclude environmental factors from his experiment.
LikeLike
If you want a detailed discussion of the issue, I would refer you to Steven Pinker’s ‘Blank Slate’.
LikeLike