Civilisation, Counter-Jihad, Counterjihad, Crime, Defend the modern world, Grooming of underage girls, Immigration, Muslim grooming, Muslims Problem, Muslims screw up Multiculturalism, Rotherham grooming gangs
In our consideration of Islamic crime in Britain, we must never forget our geography. To maintain the right perspective, we must never forget how distant this island is from the hell-holes of Islam and how unnatural it is that women are beheaded in Enfield, raped in Rotherham and blown up in Edgware in its name. All this blood flows from a single wound; a single mistake, the making of which was unnatural and recent.
The idea that Muslim commonwealth citizens were assimilable into Western, or even British society was a fancy of our elders. It was considered radical even then, when history lay dormant like a sleeping leviathan and a peaceable weakness sedated the whole Islamic region.
For over a thousand years, there was no Muslim influence on Britain outside of foreign policy. Common folk were happily ignorant of sharia law and of the increasingly fatal divide between Sunni and Shia. It took the concussion of the Second World War to make our elites dizzy enough to change this. The mistake was made indigenously; the seedlings of rapists and murderers were patted down by native hands.
Recognising how recently this mistake was made, and how radical and strange the decision was to make it, allows for clearer thinking. It allows for the person reflecting to realise that this country is not bound by any moral law to accept the consequences of it without comment, or without the right to reverse its decision.
When I talk of deportation, the echoes that sound in your imagination deceive you. My suggestion has nothing to do with the spirit of Nazism, Stalinism or Aminism. It is not the excess but the right of a country, over 3000 years in age, to admit a recent mistake and seek to reverse it.
England was wrong to admit Muslims. It was an action allowed by an ignorance of history and a moral naivety rooted in that same ignorance. England (or at least that generation of command) wronged also those Muslims it allowed to settle. They are different kinds of human, with different ways of eating, praying and thinking, and they cannot simply be ordered by their importers to change their nature or adapt it to something incompatible with the prejudice of their hearts. The anxieties they and we feel are inevitable and will only grow stronger with time.
This isn’t a bomb that needs to go off. It can be defused (if we try) by a negotiated settlement. But to start that negotiation, the kafir peoples of this country must first make clear that nothing is irreversible, that the abuses of Hitler will not dictate the moral decisions of the present, and – most essentially – that Britain is under no moral obligation to kill itself trying to swallow what it cannot digest.
We don’t have to take this. Nor – for that matter – does France, Germany, India, Israel, Russia, Micronesia or Haiti. All countries make mistakes, but as long as these countries can admit (in a tone free of vitriol) “We were wrong and we want to become right again…” they should be listened to.
This isn’t (for the millionth time) a racist thing. I live in the south of London, a city of Africans, Chinese, Jews and a million other beautiful differences. I personally adore living in a cosmopolitan society like this. If the claims of racism were true, house prices would be higher in Cumbria and Cardiff than Hackney and Tottenham. They’re not though, and for good reason.
Only one minority is actively screwing things up here. Only one minority (and its misbehaviour) keeps the BNP and National Front in money and members.
And so, in place of the manifestos, militant phrases and hateful noises that too often cloud this debate, let’s offer instead a crystalline honesty: We have made a mistake. We are sorry we made it. But we want to make things better. And never let it be said we don’t have the right to make it better.
This was what I was wondering the other day.
Why did the U.K allow this?
My country India had no choice.
We were invaded repeatedly by Muslim armies from the North-West, had Muslim kingdoms and empires for almost 800 years, imposing Jaziya tax and other humiliations on non-muslims in a incentive to convert non-muslims.
Will Durant, the famous historian summed it up like this:
“The Islamic conquest of India is probably the bloodiest story in history. It is a discouraging tale, for its evident moral is that civilization is a precious good, whose delicate complex of order and freedom, culture and peace, can at any moment be overthrown by barbarians invading from without or multiplying within.”
That is why V.S.Naipaul called India a wounded civilization,
(I can say with confidence that 200 years of British rule for all it’s faults and depredations had a calming and healing effect on India, even though ‘nationalistic’ Indians would loathe to admit it.)
Indian leaders could have demanded a complete population transfer when the Muslims demanded partition on religious lines. They were naive and trying to be too-tolerant and too-good in my opinion, and India still suffers for their nativity, ‘tolerance’ & ‘goodness’.
Anyway, the U.K had none of these traumas. Why did she go out of her way to court these dangers? It will be one of the great mysteries of history!
Defend the Modern World said:
It was naivety born out of ignorance. The British are a very intelligent people, but we have a habit of electing fools.
Well, what happened is in 1973 OPEC blackmailed the West and to negotiate a better and more permanent flow of Oil, the West agreed to cease supporting Israel and to import moslims into the West. Our borders went wide open, we gave them everything they wanted, reviled anyone who said anything about it as a racist comparable to Hitler, let them infiltrate everywhere and build hundreds of mosques and suck our social support systems dry breeding like rabbits. I hope we didn’t wake up too late to the horror we have allowed in our midst, and start taking measures to drive out Islam and all who think the vile Mohammed was a great guy.
Defend the Modern World said:
The EU has a lot to answer for.
Sorry to rock the boat here but what are you talking about, repatriating all the Muslims? Where to? Many Muslims were born in Britain and have no other nationality. This is not the age of the Empire, you cannot put some people on boats and send them half way round the world. You are living in a dream world. You say they cannot change their culture but nobody in the UK has yet dared to point out to them that their religion is extremely offensive to all non-Muslims. Also a lot of non-Muslims in the UK are still ignorant about Islam. When it says us kuffirs must be killed or forced to pay the jizya tax, I’m willing to bet a that many Muslims have just simply not registered the fact of exactly how offensive that is to the rest of us. Its time to start telling the truth about Islam – its time for our leaders and media to stop propagating lies about it. When James Foley was killed Cameron said it had nothing to do with Islam. We have got to call him up on that lie. If we stop immigration now, stop funding huge families on welfare and start re-educating everyone about what Islam really is then there is a chance we can turn the tide. We have to come up with realistic solutions here otherwise Labour will be elected and the nightmare Idiocracy that you rightly warn us about will advance unabated.
Defend the Modern World said:
The Pakistani community have very strong links with Pakistan, often travelling their to weddings and family gatherings. This isn’t like asking British Blacks to move to Africa. Pakistanis have not integrated and still live an Islamic life. We should confront them and say clearly – “Do you want to live in an Islamic country or a secular country?” – If they answer the latter, then they can stay if they promise to live a discreet life. Those who prefer to live according to a strict interpretation of Sharia, should be told to leave. It is our right. We could refuse them employment, government benefits and take other measures to ensure they won’t stay. We should also strictly enforce a ban on Halal (though not Kosher) slaughter, which by-itself would lead to an exodus from Britain.
Defend the Modern World said:
What other solutions are there?
You are very right to raise the marriage issue. In fact the coalition have at least (very recently) put a small restriction on this indirectly by requiring immigrant spouses to have a certain level of income. Most of our politicians have been too frightened of talking about this, just as they were afraid to mention the grooming gangs. We could outlaw Islam, we could ban the building of mosques (Switzerland achieved a ban on new minarets partly because the people have a genuine say on policy in that country). These are solutions that will send a message and start making people wake up, and as you say may encourage some to leave, but some may also become apostates. They may even lead to violence in the short term, but some degree of violence is probably coming anyway. The longer we allow our feeble leaders to grovel on their feet before the Muslim community (David Cameron, Simon Hughes I’m talking to you), the worse it is likely to be when it does come. We’re often reminded of the scary fact that there are 1.5 billion Muslims in the world, but lets not forget that there are still 5.5 billion NON Muslims in the world. Scary, eh?
On a personal note I want to tell you I have known a number of Muslims in my life. They were good to me, and I remember them as dear friends, not as Muslims. Back then, I didn’t know anything at all about their religion, if I had done I would have had to challenge them about it. For too long our politicians and media have either been ignorant about Islam or willfully lying about it. In my view the most important first step is to put an end to this weakness in our own leadership, to ensure that our politicians are both aware of the reality and not afraid to tell the truth about it. I suspect if its not ignorance then they are motivated by terror of upsetting the oil countries and of pushing more Muslims to join the terrorists. However I think in the long run this dishonesty is just encouraging the religion to grow stronger. If telling the truth upsets people, then so be it.
Just to repeat though, we cannot forcibly repatriate UK citizens to anywhere at all, no matter what. Perhaps that wasn’t really what you meant.
Start with the low-hanging fruit. Campaign like billy-o to get citizenship removed from – or permanent exile and/ or Outlawry imposed upon – those who have gone off to wallow in the jihad bloodbath in Syria/ Iraq/ Islamic State, so as to prevent them from returning to create a jihad bloodbath in Britain. Do NOTHING to prevent the especially-jihad-minded from leaving infidel countries; but the moment they are gone, the moment they may be reasonably assumed to be somewhere like Islamic State – or Somalia or Yemen or Afghanistan or Libya, busy imitating warlord Mohammed – then: pfffft! their infidel-country citizenship – which by their actions they have shown they manifestly despise – should evaporate into thin air. This should be done not only in the UK but in Australia and Canada and USA and everywhere else that has now discovered that Muslims holding their (infidel-country) passports are busy chopping off heads, kidnapping and slave-trading women, etc. The West would be free of perhaps *thousands* of the most immediately dangerous, in a jiffy, if this particular measure were resolutely taken.
And I think it also very reasonable to campaign for a total halt to Muslim immigration, including reception of Muslim “refugees”…since among other things we need to free up places for those being *persecuted* by Muslims, such as the subject-to-genocide Christians of Syria and Iraq. The non-Muslim victims of Islam need *all* the available “humanitarian visa” and “refugee and asylum” places and should go to the top of the queue. If the West STOPPED importing Muslims by the bucketful, that would free up places for assimilable and desperately-in-need people who are right now in danger of being exterminated by Muslims: notably the Assyrian / Chaldean Christians of Syria and Iraq, but not forgetting the Copts, whose situation is still very precarious (had Al-Sisi and the Egyptian army not toppled Morsi, the Copts would be in as much danger as the Assyrian Christians are in, right now, I am sure of it).
Stopping the influx of Muslims altogether, even at this stage, would do a lot to make the situation more manageable within the West: “when in hole, stop digging”.
I think also that a thorough investigation of the manner in which many Muslims have gained entry should be undertaken; strippings of citizenship or of residency or “refugee” status, followed by evictions to country of origin, could take place wherever it was discovered that citizenship, or residency, or “refugee” / humanitarian visas, had been obtained by fraudulent / criminal means.
Defend the Modern World said:
Not to sound overly optimistic, but I think a ban on Muslim immigration will be enacted soon in a European country. Perhaps the Netherlands will go first. It’s the least we can do as a civilisation. I also agree that our asylum policy should be open to Christians facing persecution from ISIS.
best post workout supplements of 2012 said:
My brother recommended I might like this website. He was totally right.
This post actually made my day. You cann’t imagine
just how much time I had spent for this information! Thanks!
Wonderful website you have here but I was wondering if you knew of any message boards that cover the same topics talked about in this article? I’d really love to be a part of online community where I can get feedback from other experienced people that share the same interest. If you have any recommendations, please let me know. Bless you!