Tags
America 911, BBC, Civilisation, Counter-Jihad, Cultural Marxism, Defend the modern world, Islamification of Britain, Multiculturalism, No to Turkey in the EU, Race and ethnicity in the United States Census
Unless you’re a devoted reader of the Counter-Jihad press, you’ll likely be unaware of the most recent testimony by child-killer Anders Behring Breivik.
His latest communication, a rambling letter directed to the media but as yet unremarked upon by it, dramatically exposes the real intentions behind that bloody July afternoon, and at the same time dispenses conclusively with the lies that have hitherto obscured those intentions from view.
The official narrative concerning Mr Breivik – still maintained by the press to this day – portrays him as a brain-washed dupe of dogmatic Islamophobes, most notably the bloggers Fjordman and Baron Bodissey, the vlogger Patrick Condell and the celebrated cultural critic Robert Spencer. Indeed, such was the image deliberately constructed in the killer’s manifesto 2083: A European Declaration of Independence, in which he credits almost every major CounterJihad author as a direct influence.
Now however, Breivik has come clean about his real motivations. This is an excerpt from the killer’s letter:
“The compendium (2083) was, among other things, of a calculated and quite cynical “gateway-design” (the 2+2=6-approach), created to strengthen the ethnocentrist wing in the contra-jihad movement, by pinning the whole thing on the anti-ethnocentrist wing (many of the leaders are pro-multiculti social democrats or liberalists), while at the same time protecting and strengthening the ethnocentrist-factions. The idea was to manipulate the MSM and others so that they would launch a witch-hunt and send their “media-rape-squads” against our opponents. It worked quite well.”
He goes on…
“I know a lot of people will be disappointed when reading this, but my love for Israel is limited to its future function as a deportation-port for disloyal Jews. I am aware of the sad fact that all available statistics confirm that only aprox. three percent of eurojews oppose multiculti (but from an anti-islamist perspective), and that only aprox. 0,2 percent support nordic indigenous rights. I wish it wasn’t so… However, there is in fact a strong anti-nordicist/ethnocentrist wing within the counter-jihad movement, represented by Fjordman and his Jewish network, the EDL-leader, the SIOE-leaders, Wilders, Farage etc…”
The ability to have lied this well is the mark of a psychopath. Breivik never really endorsed the CounterJihad movement at all and so we no longer need to apologise for him. He is a formulaic Nazi, no different to the enemy in character, and we are all owed an apology from those who equated our views with his.
D, LDN.
Defend the Modern World 
When it quacks like a duck, and when it walks like a duck, it probably has the mind of a duck!
LikeLike
Absolutely.
LikeLike
Quote:
“The compendium (2083) was, among other things, of a calculated and quite cynical “gateway-design” (the 2+2=6-approach), created to strengthen the ethnocentrist wing in the contra-jihad movement, by pinning the whole thing on the anti-ethnocentrist wing (many of the leaders are pro-multiculti social democrats or liberalists),
end
Lie, lie, and lie.
Anders Behring Breivik is the best friend the Ummah ever had.
He should submit and get it over with.
LikeLike
Indeed, he is now brought up with depressing regularity by the Left as evidence that non-Muslims can be violent too.
LikeLike